Quantcast
Opinion

In our opinion: Vexing questions raised after Bergdahl prisoner exchange

Comments

Return To Article
  • JoeBlow Far East USA, SC
    June 3, 2014 5:38 a.m.

    Admittedly, I dont know all the details, but on the surface, I dont get it?

    I dont get the wisdom of a 5 for 1 swap.
    I dont get the wisdom of trading 5 highly dangerous individuals for Bergdahl
    I dont get the concept of "we cant leave a man on the battlefiels"

    Basically, it would seem to me that this exchange will lead to more captured American soldiers.

    I dont get it.

  • louie Cottonwood Heights, UT
    June 3, 2014 6:44 a.m.

    and if he died in captivity what then would have been said about the Obama Administration?

  • liberal larry salt lake City, utah
    June 3, 2014 7:37 a.m.

    Don't I remember something about trading arms to Iran for hostages?

  • Nate Pleasant Grove, UT
    June 3, 2014 7:45 a.m.

    Obama is just giving you what you voted for. He can't close down Guantanamo without either holding military tribunals or releasing dangerous prisoners. The court trial on American soil didn't quite work out.

    Think before you vote.

  • UtahBlueDevil Durham, NC
    June 3, 2014 7:54 a.m.

    Do you get the wisdom holding hundreds in prison without charging them with any crime - what so ever?

    Which sets a more problematic long term problem for America... the holding of people with out charges for a decade, or saving a young man from being held prisoner for 5 years.

    What I find most vexing here is we this same crowd holds Israel up as the poster child of how to deal with terrorist, and yet they have many times exchanged prisoners. Do we only get it when they do it, but not when we do?

    Have we forgotten about Francis Gary Powers? Or going way back to 1864, the Belle Plain prisoner exchange. This is absolutely nothing new.

    "I don't get the concept of "we cant leave a man on the battlefield"?

    Obviously you didn't serve, and you don't remember Vietnam.

  • pragmatistferlife salt lake city, utah
    June 3, 2014 7:55 a.m.

    Here's some ideas Joe.

    5 for 1..they only had one of ours and we have a boatful of theirs. One who was in failing health and one for whom the window of opportunity was closing rapidly. Let me ask the question again how many Afghans are worth one American on the free market (not being facetious)?

    Trading 5 dangerous individuals for one. First of all these are Taliban leaders. The Taliban is a terrorist organization but not an international terrorist organization. Their purpose is to control one of the most backward, and tribal countries in the world.

    They have shot and killed Americans because we came in and shot and killed them. Now we are leaving. This has been played out over and over again in Afghanistan for the past 500 years, always with the same result.

    The country is always pretty much the same collection of warring tribes and Kabul when the invader leaves regardless of the invaders intent. Doesn't matter whether you wanted to conquer Afghanistan, turn it in to a democracy, or run off Al Qaeda, it ends the same way.

    We cant leave a man on the battlefields, ask a soldier about the importance of loyalty.
    "

  • Esquire Springville, UT
    June 3, 2014 8:05 a.m.

    Have you forgotten Iran-Contra, one of Reagan's scandals? Israel has had prisoner exchanges. This is hardly unique. Besides, even if he did desert, the Army will deal with it. Better to clean up this mess rather than leave the guy there to be used as a propaganda tool of the Taliban, whether willingly or unwillingly. In the end, if I thought the Republicans had an ounce of good intent, I might give their arguments more credibility. They don't and I won't. Let the Army sort it out.

  • Jim1027 St. George, UT
    June 3, 2014 8:05 a.m.

    This is definitely one of your best editorials. I'm glad you're not worried about being politically correct today.

    This is just another reason why Mitt Romney should be our Commander-in-Chief.

    What will Obama say when it is revealed he was a collaborater?

  • I see nothing! Casa Grande, AZ
    June 3, 2014 8:20 a.m.

    No man left behind... unless it could be viewed as a good political move for democrats - then let the guy die over there. That's the republican line now?

    Oh we're not saying.... we're just saying. And it goes on.

    And then there's the FACT that republicans have made it illegal to shut down Guantanamo and then criticize Obama for not shutting down Guantanamo. Must be nice to have it all different ways. Honesty sure doesn't get in the way.

  • LDS Liberal Farmington, UT
    June 3, 2014 8:29 a.m.

    I wish the DN editorial board had spent 1/100th the time considering supporting the invasion of 2 Middle Eastern countries, 13 years or war, $4 trillion, 6,000 american lives, and 75,000 Americans wounded --

    As they have over this 1 POW exchange...

  • Utah Soldier Bountiful, UT
    June 3, 2014 8:56 a.m.

    As an American Soldier, I am grateful for the return of one of my own. Prisoner exchanges are a common event in a war.

    That being said, however, it is going to get real ugly as SGT Bergdahl's actions are investigated. Despite the fact that his actions have been discussed ever since he went missing, it will be viewed as a partisan political way to get back at the President for the swap.

    Unfortunately, had the political parties been reversed, I feel that the political bickering would be similar.

  • JoeBlow Far East USA, SC
    June 3, 2014 9:22 a.m.

    "Unfortunately, had the political parties been reversed, I feel that the political bickering would be similar."

    True That.

    People look at EVERYTHING through partisan glasses. They go into any and every issue looking to either support their beloved party or to bash the evil other one.

    Both parties do and have done virtually the same thing. It is so humorous to watch the hairs people split to somehow make what their party did, totally different.

  • E Sam Provo, UT
    June 3, 2014 9:23 a.m.

    You could have saved a lot of column inches if you had simply written the only thing that should have been written: "Welcome home, soldier, and we thank you for your service."

  • LDS Liberal Farmington, UT
    June 3, 2014 9:33 a.m.

    @E Sam
    Provo, UT
    You could have saved a lot of column inches if you had simply written the only thing that should have been written: "Welcome home, soldier, and we thank you for your service."

    9:23 a.m. June 3, 2014

    ========

    Impossible to do for the "We hate all things Obama" crowd.

  • 2 bits Cottonwood Heights, UT
    June 3, 2014 9:32 a.m.

    If releasing 5 highly dangerous prisoners is what it takes to get him back... that's what it takes.

    I agree with the philosophy that we don't leave our people behind (IF) we can get them back. Sometimes you can't.

    But there's something fishy here. 5 highly dangerous prisoners for one marine who apparently walked off his post... Just seems way out of proportion.

    I can see doing that for a marine captured in battle, but not for one who walked over to their side evidently intending to get caught.

    We also need to get to the bottom of his father's tweets in support of the prisoners at Gitmo. According to the Washington Post, he tweeted, "I'm still working for the release of all the Guantanimo prisoners. God will repay for the death of every Afghan child Ameen"...

    If his family turns out to be Taliban sympathizers... and good soldiers gave their lives searching for a deserter... it won't be pretty.

  • Mike Richards South Jordan, Utah
    June 3, 2014 9:40 a.m.

    What is the penalty for desertion? Soldiers are telling us that the Sargent deserted and that at least six soldiers were killed because of that desertion. It seems strange that a President would violate the Constitution to reward a soldier who left his unit, but our President is a master at deflection. When the heat is on him for the deaths in the VA, he diverts attention.

  • Strider303 Salt Lake City, UT
    June 3, 2014 9:43 a.m.

    He left his unit, comrades and security of the compound on his own. Sounds like desertion to me.

    No, we don't want to leave anyone behind, but we have. There are aircrew members from the Korean and Vietnam wars that are unaccounted for, some probably transported to the Soviet Union. Our government chose not to pursue their release.

    The question remains that this man willfully left his unit, in a combat situation. Risked the lives of other soldiers in search operations.

    I don't agree with the swap, it enables a hardened enemy. It is another clumsy foreign policy decision by an administration who is woefully inept in their various roles.

    If the negotiations have been going on for several years, what is Hilliary's role in this?

    "What difference does it make?" Just sayin'

  • 2 bits Cottonwood Heights, UT
    June 3, 2014 9:44 a.m.

    Then there's the little legal issue of... it's the law that they have to notify Congress first. The Administration didn't.

    I know. Many Presidents (including Reagan) also conducted covert operations, and made deals without notifying the media (and probably Congress). It goes on. We just have to assume that what we get is worth what we expend to get it.

    The question is... what did we get in this case... a deserter? Or a hero?
    And for what? I've heard that at least 6 good marines were killed in operations conducted to find him and get him back. Now we put 5 very dangerous people back on the war field to kill more Afghan women and children (and Americans if we don't get out fast).

    The question is... what did we get... and at what price?

    If we gave up 5 Taliban supporters and 6 marine's lives, to get one deserter and a Taliban sympathizer back... it wsn't a good deal (IMO).

    I guess we will find out eventually.

    Remember all the investigations and grief Reagan and those involved in HIS covert opps (intended to get back US prisoners of war) got when discovered...

  • Shawnm750 West Jordan, UT
    June 3, 2014 9:44 a.m.

    @louie - He put himself in that situation when he walked away from his post. He wasn't captured while performing his duties as a soldier, but during an act of desertion. Perhaps he was misguided or even suffering from some mental condition that prompted him to do what he did. Or maybe he really just decided he was done serving. Regardless, he found himself in those circumstances as the result of his own actions. And, let's not forget about his fellow soldiers that put themselves in harms way to find him, some of whom lost their own lives looking for him.

    So to answer your question: "...and if he died in captivity what then would have been said about the Obama Administration?" In my opinion, the administration would've been sending a message that the U.S. isn't going to hand over terrorists to get back deserters.

    I know his family is glad to have him back, but I'm the families of the soldiers who died while looking for him would've loved to have them back as well...

  • Ernest T. Bass Bountiful, UT
    June 3, 2014 10:13 a.m.

    We should have just left him because that's what we, the most moral and religiously correct country on earth does.

  • Schnee Salt Lake City, UT
    June 3, 2014 10:31 a.m.

    @JoeBlow
    "Basically, it would seem to me that this exchange will lead to more captured American soldiers."

    What do you think terrorists would do to American soldiers they essentially capture (could capture if they deemed it worthwhile) if they don't see any worth in it?

  • 2 bits Cottonwood Heights, UT
    June 3, 2014 10:33 a.m.

    Don't worry too much about the release of the 5 high value Taliban prisoners. Obama was going to release them anyway... for NOTHING. We may as well get SOMETHING for them!

    Barack Obama has been promising and trying to release ALL the prisoners from Guantanamo and close it for more than 6 years! He was going to release them anyway... we may as well get SOMETHING for these 5!

    ====

    Now... we've already committed to remove all US troops from Afghanistan (something the Taliban wants more than anything, given to them for nothing).... and we've given back the main people they want.... What other bargaining chips do we have left???

    ====

    How long do you think it will be before Obama ignores Congress and closes Guantanamo releasing all the prisoners on his own... by Presidential Order?

    He's already tried it closing it once (by presidential order)...

    And he told us in the State of the Union address that he doesn't need Congress to do what he wants...

    Lots of things need to happen in the next 2 years (for his legacy).

    Maybe he will heal America's racial-divide, and end partisanship and Washington-as-usual (as promised)...

  • JoeBlow Far East USA, SC
    June 3, 2014 11:09 a.m.

    "Maybe he will heal America's racial-divide, and end partisanship and Washington-as-usual (as promised)..."

    Takes 2 to tango.

    Also, Guantanamo? Charge them, try them or release them. Holding these guys indefinitely is wrong.

  • Joan Watson TWIN FALLS, ID
    June 3, 2014 11:13 a.m.

    Joe Blow, Esquire. So, two wrongs make a right? Your constant comparing past history remarks are restated over and over to the point of becoming nauseous and banal. As one historian has written - if we do not LEARN from the past - we will repeat the same errors over and over.
    And to those who constantly criticize Deseret Ness - simple solution to frustration - read another news source.

  • MoNoMo Fair Oaks, CA
    June 3, 2014 11:14 a.m.

    2 bits,

    Obama NEVER said he wanted to "release" all prisoner in GITMO. We wanted to move them to Federal Prisons in the US and use Federal Courts for trials, where possible.

    Also keep in mind that Bush released over 300 from GITMO - Government reports indicate that around 30% returned to battle. (Notice any right-wingers making issue of that?) One possibly implicated in the tragedy at Benghazi.

  • LDS Liberal Farmington, UT
    June 3, 2014 11:16 a.m.

    Let's face it...

    Some people think Bush starting 2 wars,
    spending $4 trillion,
    4,000 Americans dead,
    75,000 wounded,
    violating Geneva convention laws about Gitmo, and torture --
    NO Osama Bin Laden,
    and Mission Accomplished!

    Pres. Obama pulls the troops out, and home,
    KILLS Osama Bin Laden,
    and does a POW swap and he's now a defective Leader by these same conservatives?

    Politics is blind,
    Bias is conflicted to common sense,
    and one-side hatred is truely irrational.

  • JoeBlow Far East USA, SC
    June 3, 2014 11:30 a.m.

    "Your constant comparing past history remarks are restated over and over to the point of becoming nauseous and banal"

    Too funny Joan. Did you read my posts in this thread? I actually disagree with this latest prisoner swap and said so. Nope, I didn't compare it to anything. Sorry.

    In other areas, I do point out past history. Not to justify current actions, but to point out the hypocrisy and pure partisanship.

    I will say it again. I believe that this prisoner swap was ill conceived.

  • Irony Guy Bountiful, Utah
    June 3, 2014 11:30 a.m.

    Irony of the Week: Our POW gets back alive after 5 years. Republicans blow their stacks.

  • Hutterite American Fork, UT
    June 3, 2014 11:38 a.m.

    There's been a lot of armchair quarterbacking of this thing as it unfolds. Just how should it have played out? This guy was off our radar until the deal went down, but what if we'd have known about him a week earlier? By we, i mean the public at large. Would we be howling to have this american in failing health brought home, lest we heap scorn on the administration? If they came back and said five was too many, he has to stay as their captive, how would we have reacted? Heavens, what would fox say? Now the rescued is half a pariah, as if he'd been on John Kerrys' swift boat. But in the end, our guy comes home, they got 5 thugs back and no one is happy no matter how it turns out. But as we fret about those released, remember this. Terrorism isn't about what they do to us. It's about what we do to us after that.

  • Anti Bush-Obama Chihuahua, 00
    June 3, 2014 11:46 a.m.

    If they really cared about the soldiers, they wouldn't even be in the middle east. They are the UN's hired muscle and nothing more.

  • Anti Bush-Obama Chihuahua, 00
    June 3, 2014 11:50 a.m.

    LDS Liberal

    "Pres. Obama pulls the troops out, and home,"

    Obama pulled the troops out? When did this happen?

    He is a war monger just like Bush. If I had my way, they would be sharing a cell.

  • Happy Valley Heretic Orem, UT
    June 3, 2014 11:56 a.m.

    Bush didn't even show up for guard duty, In the States, and your judging this young man.
    Republican's hypocrisy know no bounds. We left men in Vietnam, we have learned, hopefully.

    Tailban were our friends when we armed and trained them and called them freedom fighters,
    when Russia was invading. They are not al qaeda.

  • CHS 85 Sandy, UT
    June 3, 2014 12:35 p.m.

    As some of the more ardent contributors here posted about John Swallow - why don't we wait for the story to unfold and the wheels of justice to turn before judging? If he's guilty of a Courts Martial offense, it'll happen. Wait for for the evidence - innocent until proven guilty, yada, yada, yada, is all we heard from you guys for months during the Swallow scandal. Perhaps this young man deserves the same courtesy.

  • FT salt lake city, UT
    June 3, 2014 12:35 p.m.

    When it comes to opinion on war and the fight against terror the DN review board has been more often than not on the wrong side. Remember them supporting almost all of GWB's positions and those killed hundreds of thousands of innocent lives and cost our country billions of dollars.
    BO's opinions have turned out to be much better for America and the rest of the world. I'll trust him on this one over the DN.

  • UtahBlueDevil Durham, NC
    June 3, 2014 12:52 p.m.

    To all you worried about the law stating the president needs to inform (BTW McCain confirmed congress has "some" knowledge this was in the works), can you all please find the part of the constitution that says we can hold people in prison without charging them with a crime? I can't seem to find that section.

    Either these five guys were combatants held as prisoners of war (remember that the Taliban was the government in place at the time these people we're taken captive), or they are terrorist. If they were combatants, we don't need to charge them. If they are terrorist - we can't hold them without charge. It is really simple.

    As to the attacks on this soldiers character and his family as justification for partisan rhetoric.... no one has proven he deserted... no one has charged his dad as an enemy sympathizer. What happened to "innocent" until proven guilty. Do we suspend that when it is politically expedient.

    This guy is getting harsher treatment than the GI who killed an innocent family... and this is wrong. His politics or beliefs should have nothing to do with honoring his sacrifice and keeping our commitment.

  • Screwdriver Casa Grande, AZ
    June 3, 2014 1:00 p.m.

    Whatever the eventual case is with Bergdahl, anyone wiling to judge him prematurely without evidence is not a supporter of the troops. You may as well spit on him and call him a baby killer.

    If it turns out he violated military code then I'm sure he'll answer for it. Let the investigation take place before dishonoring him.

  • UT Brit London, England
    June 3, 2014 1:23 p.m.

    I love the "they will try and capture our troops now" line. Are you seriously saying this has not been their number 1 goal since forever? Do you guys have zero knowledge of history or guerilla warfare?

  • 2 bits Cottonwood Heights, UT
    June 3, 2014 1:55 p.m.

    The ironic part is... IF Bush had done this, Esquire, LDS Liberal and Ernest T. Bass would be the ones complaining.

    Remember when BUSH could do nothing right (in their eyes)... And Obama has basically continued everything Bush did... but Obama is perfect in every-way (even when he does exactly what Bush would have done)...

  • LDS Liberal Farmington, UT
    June 3, 2014 2:09 p.m.

    Mike Richards
    South Jordan, Utah
    What is the penalty for desertion? Soldiers are telling us that the Sargent deserted and that at least six soldiers were killed because of that desertion. It seems strange that a President would violate the Constitution to reward a soldier who left his unit, but our President is a master at deflection. When the heat is on him for the deaths in the VA, he diverts attention.

    9:40 a.m. June 3, 2014

    =========

    Gee Mike,
    Why don't we see if there is enough evidence [and not talk radio hear-say] to even draw up charges.

    The Uniformed Code of Military Justice will then hold a Court Martial.

    This matter will not be tried on TV via FoxNews and trumped up charges in a Kangaroo Court of Public Opinion in a Bananna Republic.

    Thanks for your pretended supoort of our troops.
    At least Sgt. Bergdahl had the guts to enlist and GO to the Middle East for his country.

  • Happy Valley Heretic Orem, UT
    June 3, 2014 2:18 p.m.

    @ 2bits -Bush didn't even show up for guard duty, In the States.

  • Henry Drummond San Jose, CA
    June 3, 2014 2:38 p.m.

    I believe the administration has already indicated that Congress was notified of the negotiations some three years ago. I think it is also significant that drone attacks against the Taliban have stopped for now. Meanwhile, the new government has agreed to have close to 10,000 troops stay in the country. I think there may be something larger going on here than just a prisoner swap.

  • use the noodle Casa Grande, AZ
    June 3, 2014 4:48 p.m.

    "Though Cheney told Fox News on Monday that he would not have agreed to the deal, Bellinger stressed that the Bush administration “returned something like 500 detainees from Guantanamo.”

    Statistics from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence show that only 6 percent (5 in total) of Guantanamo detainees released during the Obama administration have potentially engaged in militant activities. That compares with a rate of nearly 30 percent under the Bush administration."

  • Moderate Salt Lake City, UT
    June 3, 2014 10:45 p.m.

    "Everyone should be happy that Bergdahl is coming home after five years. But we should hope the price of his homecoming does not prove to be costly."

    After spending years with the Taliban, perhaps Bergdahl has information which can be used against them.

  • UtahBlueDevil Durham, NC
    June 4, 2014 5:38 a.m.

    From our local constitutionalist we have,

    "What is the penalty for desertion? Soldiers are telling us that the Sargent deserted and that at least six soldiers were killed because of that desertion. It seems strange that a President would violate the Constitution to reward a soldier who left his unit, but our President is a master at deflection. When the heat is on him for the deaths in the VA, he diverts attention."

    Mike.... somewhere in there buried deep in the constitution is this little concept called due process, and that you are not guilty until proven so. This guy may ultimately be found to have left his post. But to this point, he has not even been charged with anything. To say the President should leave someone to die in enemy hands based on something not yet proven is the most unconstitutional of acts.

    Due process is the most elemental construct of constitutional law - being an expert - I though you would understand that.

  • Lilalips Attleboro, MA
    June 4, 2014 6:57 a.m.

    Leave the guy to rot. He walked off the job. He deserted his post. In another country, he would have been simply shot. He is at best a deserter, at worse, a collaborator with terrorists.

  • GaryO Virginia Beach, VA
    June 4, 2014 7:24 a.m.

    "Vexing questions raised after Bergdahl prisoner exchange"

    And? . . .

    Vexing Questions are raised in the minds of "Conservatives" whenever Michelle Obama wears a knew dress.

    Is there anything about the Obamas that does not vex "Conservatives?"

    Let's look at situation at hand here.

    We had one POW in the Aghan war. The Obama administration arranged for his release.

    And NO, it did not involve negotiations with terrorists. It involved the imprisonment of an American service member in the hands enemy combatants in a wartime situation . . And it involved his negotiated release.

    Prisoner exchanges are nothing new. Abe Lincoln arranged for the exchange of tens of thousands.

    Does that vex DN too?

  • happy2bhere clearfield, UT
    June 4, 2014 7:26 a.m.

    Funny that some of you are bringing up the arms for hostages during Reagans years. So are you now saying that it was a good thing for Reagan to do? Sounds like it if you attempting to defend this Obama move. Or do you agree that is was wrong. In which case you are saying that the Obama move is wrong too. You can't defend Obama by using something that for decades now you have used against Reagan.

    This was a stupid deal from the White House that thought they would be doing victory laps in the public opinion polls with it. The interesting question now is will Bergdhal be court martialed for desertion and other things, or will the White House intervene and try to stop the Army from doing what it should? Because if it comes out that Obama has in essense released 5 terrorist leaders in exchange for one traitor, it will be another feather out of the cap of the Obama legacy. Which hasn't got many feathers to begin with.

  • FT1/SS Virginia Beach, VA
    June 4, 2014 11:02 a.m.

    Berghal, I would like to know what was his breaking point? He's not the first in Afghan! Looks like he was unqualified in a combat zone.

    Which brings up his chain of command. After hearing his team leader, and teammates. Who did you report your findings too? What did you do about it? If the team leader reported his findings to the chain of command, what did the chain of command do? Sounds like a breakdown in leadership and the system. It cost the lives of six.

    There were several Taliban factions who were with us in the fall of 2001, in getting rid of Al Qaeda. The Taliban committed there terror when we stayed after Tora Bora.

    I put no fault on the father for his behavior. My son is in the middle east today, and I would do anything to get him out under the same circumstances.

    Why swap these five guys? We will see them again. It was a demand by the taliban, not a negotiation.

    Why the secrecy, it would of been a circus without it.

    Winnners Taliban, Bergdahl's. Losers, American people. I blame Bush for getting us there, and Obama for keeping us there.

  • Dan Maloy Enid, OK
    June 4, 2014 12:49 p.m.

    Wow.

    Just wow.

    I am absolutely amazed and terribly, terribly disappointed at the amount of foolishness and short-sighted thinking being expressed about this story.

    The longer I live the more I see that liberals typically DO think primarily in the short term, do not like rules/discipline, tend to live with a "there is no 'bad'" mentality, do not believe that life should be hard or that anything good can come from difficulty and sacrifice and that our enemies are only our enemies because we just aren't nice enough to them.

    Absolute folly.

    Does anyone REALLY believe that the 5 terrorists will NOT become active in the war on terror again? How will this NOT embolden our enemies? How? Suddenly, the same enemy that produced and actively fosters a culture so hardened and depraved that they literally sawed the heads off of Americans (remember the reporter Daniel Pearl?) is now likely to be our friends because we gave them 5 prisoners?

    Madness. Absolute madness.

    Reading the comments here it's now wonder we're in the mess we're in.

    How long, Lord, how long?....

  • LOU Montana Pueblo, CO
    June 5, 2014 5:46 a.m.

    Between 2007 and 2009, President George W. Bush released 520 detainees from the facility at Guantanamo Bay – at least that’s how many are officially recorded. One of those detainees was Abu Sufian bin Qumu, who is a suspect in the Benghazi embassy attack.

    Not one American soldier in trade.

  • UtahBlueDevil Durham, NC
    June 5, 2014 7:10 a.m.

    ?Does anyone REALLY believe that the 5 terrorists will NOT become active in the war on terror again? How will this NOT embolden our enemies? "

    Really.... so what terrorist acts were these five charged with? I agree..... "Madness. Absolute madness." Americans have now accepted tabloid journalism and political rhetoric as evidence enough to convict. Due process, rule of law..... who needs them when you have talking heads deciding the fate of many.

    I have no doubt these guys might not be the best friends of America. I have no doubt they may try to harm America. But these men were incarcerated as prisoners of war - not terrorist. Any proclamations otherwise are not backed by the law. If they were terrorist, we have had 10 years to charge them. If you want to be upset about anything it should be our lack in ability to charge these men with anything - even Jay-walking.

    The constitution isn't suspended just because we don't like someone.

    So yes, I agree... I am disgusted by many of the comments - particularly those that would abandon the constitution and rule of law....

  • cjb Bountiful, UT
    June 6, 2014 9:59 a.m.

    People who say we shouldn't have prisoner exchanges to free soldiers are not worthy of o have the military protect against them.

  • patriot Cedar Hills, UT
    June 9, 2014 3:24 p.m.

    It comes to this....either you believe Barack and his White House propoganda machine OR you believe our brave soldiers who served with Bergdahl. Our soldiers have come forward and called Bergdahl a diserter and a possible traitor. Team Obama has spun a different narative as they did with Benghazi and the u-tube video nonsense. At the root of the lies from the White House is the same team that lied about Benghazi including Susan Rice.

    Team Obama is now going after our soldiers - trashing them. Yes trashing the brave men who risked life and limb to bring Bergdahl back. This is THE most disgusting thing I have ever seen a sitting US president do but it is vintage Obama and vitage progressive Democrat. Trash our best and bravest to attempt to save your own sorry tail.

    "This is a spit in the face of every serving US solider" (US Army Soldiers who served and commanded Bergdahl).

  • worf Mcallen, TX
    June 16, 2014 8:56 p.m.

    We traded men like Hitler, and Joseph Stalin for a deserter.

  • cjb Bountiful, UT
    Nov. 6, 2014 1:50 p.m.

    The United States has always had prisoner of war exchanges. We did it with the Nazis during WW-2. Why should this young man be any different?

    I think those who advocate that he be left to rot should experience the very thing they advocate for him.