not to mention his Government paid "severence" package.This
is guy is the epitome of Me, Myself, and Mine -- and used his office of
"public service" to further John Swallow -- not Utah!
I hope he gets to use every penny of the fund as he needs. I still do not feel
he is guilty of anything he's accused of, except maybe being careless in
Most of that 300 k came from some very shady people. Swallow seemed more
interested in protecting them, than the good people of the state of Utah. And
for all of this we still give him a pension?
He'll need a jumpstart after all he's been through. I'm sure
he'll return to the private sector with another humanitarian effort like
When will they ever stop harassing Swallow?If they don't like
the law regarding use of left over campaign funds, then change the law,
don't whine about someone following the law and doing what is allowed.
DN News Subscriber 2Why is it that people want to defend the indefensible.
We just don't need people in high office with dark shadows in their
character. Mr Swallow said it best himself, there is no way he can
convince the public that he is innocent. If you can't, then you most
likely have some guilt. At the very least how can you have the confidence of the
Time for the public servants to start SERVING someone other than themselves.This goes across the board!!!
I don't know that the comments made are true or not. I would believe they
are not. I personally think they should drop all of these charges and save the
state money. I didn't vote for John but I also don't think he's
as bad as people are trying to make him.
Thats burning a hole in his pocket.
In the interest of journalistic integrity it might be wise to include a note in
the story itself that the amount went from $300K to $150K in a matter of
hours.Some explanation is in order here.Did the reporter err in the
dollar amount?Was there a clarification from the watchdog group?Did
the Swallow campaign correct misinformation?Or did someone quickly spend
$150,000?What's going on here?
U-tar quotes swallow as saying: ... there is no way [I] can convince the public
that [I am] innocent."That's what he says, and he's an
attorney, sworn to uphold the law and our judicial system! If he believes his
own words, then as ATG how did he ever think justice in the courts of the land
could prevail?I say, good riddance and continue further
investigation and possible prosecution. How do we convince the public that our
system of governance and justice from the AG's office is possible if the
case is not taken to its conclusion?
This incessant hounding of John Swallow kind of looks and feels like a lynching.
I've been a vocal critic when it comes to our election
fundraising laws, i.e., candidates and elected officials
"asking/soliciting/dealing" for money in ways that appear unethical. I
believe some political candidates use various types of extortion techniques to
rake in large sums of money. The problem I have with the Swallow story is that
he seems to be the one singled out for doing this. And with regards
to Swallow being able to keep the $300,000 of campaign contributions. So?
Every other retired or defeated official has done the same thing. Where do you
think Governor Mike Leavitt is getting his money to "buy" his
contribution to his "Buy (count) My Vote" Initiative. He's getting
the money from his pile of campaign money he took with him when President Bush
"released" him from serving as governor. My point is, it
feels to me like Swallow is being attacked for doing the same things that many
other elected officials are doing. I don't condone their actions, but I do
feel sympathy for John Swallow.
P.S. -- Yesterday I received a family picture Christmas card of a Utah
Congressmen serving in Washington. On the back it reads: "Paid For By
Friends of (name of Congressman)". Hummm! Paid for by his friends? It
makes one wonder what other things his friends are paying for, ... and getting