So, let me get this straight. Assuming Republican since, while I don't
know, I think I've seen stats that say that of those who actually affiliate
with a party more people are ACTUALLY registered as Republicans than Democrats.
So as of November's election there were about 15k to 20k registered voters
in a State Rep. district and assuming about 40% are registered Republicans. So
if a state rep candidate doesn't make it through the convention be getting
enough votes from the 40 - 60 delegates chosen by the 800 - 1000 caucus
attendees to cast their votes for them, then they can get on the primary ballot
by getting about 120 Republicans (15,000 * 40% * 2%) in the district to sign a
petition? Yeah, that's much better. Seems definitely worth dictating to
the respective parties who can represent them. C'mon..if we don't like
the caucus/convention system anymore let's just scrub it. If we think
it's representative of a Republic (ie. 635 in congress making decisions for
300 million + of us) then let's quit trying to mess with it.
It could be a good idea. We need a little more information, however.As it is, nominations at the convention are too often made by a very, very
small minority even of Republican party members. Thus, the extremists can pack
the most power.
I don't know about the Democrats in Utah, but the State Republican Party
leaders will hate this idea. They like being the small, activist minority than
can wag the dog. Perhaps they will say that it's not right for a state law
to dictate how a party chooses its candidates. Perhaps they don't want the
majority of Utahns to have control--it's too much like democracy.
The issue is whether an individual who is not selected by the caucus system
should be allowed to cloud the primary ballot for the various parties. The
Caucus system allows representatives of the electorate, that made the effort to
attend the caucuses, to visit with those individuals that desire to run for
specific offices. The delegates, although not all, tend to take the time to
become familiar with the various candidates positions whereas the general
electorate usually only hears sound bites to base their decisions on. If the elected delegates have any integrity I would expect them to follow the
rule of the majority of those at the caucuses. This is the only factor that may
cause this process to not result in the desired candidate of the majority. If
the delegates do a good job of vetting the candidates then it is most likely
that either a single candidate is selected for the General Election, or two of
the top three candidates are selected to run in the primary. This process
results in less expense for those individual that make it to the general
election, and results in the final candidate receiving a majority of the votes
Don't change the caucus/delegate system. It works fine and has the best
chance to give us the best candidates.
The caucus system is the best way to make sure grass roots movements can work
over large amounts of money. It is the only way someone with $100,000 can go
against someone with $2,000,000 in election funds.There were about
60,000 republicans in Utah that went to the neighborhood caucus elections in
2010 to elect the 3500 delegates. Add to those numbers to democrats and the
primary elections and certainly the municipal elections didn't do any
better in voter representation.In 2012 the number showing up again
doubled. You look at primary turnout and you will see that few voters would
decide.Most people that want the caucus system changed, there are
exceptions, are frustrated that they don't have as much power as people
that show up to the neighborhood election caucus meetings. It doesn't take
money, you just have to show up.What we need are more people getting
involved earlier, not shutting down the system that protects us from power
hungry people wanting to take over.
If you are going to run as a democratic candidate, you have to comply with their
rules. If you are going to run as a republican, you have to comply with their
rules. If you want to run and not have those rules, you can run as an
unaffiliated or independent. There are also 3rd party. This is an
attempt to change the party rules by state law, bypassing the party and is even
an attempt to change the law bypassing the legislature.