In many ways, I completely agree with the concept. The decision to spend and
responsibility for that decision should be as local as is possible. And yet
Health Insurance is something that is hugely dependent on the size of the pool
of people covered to keep cost low. The smaller the insurance pool, the higher
the rates because the risk per person covered increases. This is one
of those case where the intent is solid, but the rule of unintended consequences
may have a striking impact on the back side of this. Increasing the risk for
the insurer will result in higher cost... it is just that simple.
Obama care leaves a lot to be desired. If the state of Utah runs health care
will they do a better job than how they run the DABC? I hope we are not dead
last in spending like Education.
Can we just opt out of the federal govt. completely? People say it is about