poetic justice, since timmy-boy's antics at the auction were a scam.
The scam trust was just "redistributing wealth"...isn't that what
liberals want?It's ironic to hear how loudly liberals scream when
people take their money - that's exactly what they want to do with everyone
'The scam trust was just "redistributing wealth"...isn't that what
liberals want?' - Brave Sir Robin | 8:20 a.m. Feb. 15, 2012 ** 'Bush
signs $700 billion bailout bill' - AP - Published by Denver Post - By Tom Raum -
10/03/08 Please. Stop trying to claim 'redistribution of
wealth' is a 'liberal' idea.... when Republican President George W.
Bush, and a Republican majority in the House and Seante... signed
the first, Wall Street bail out. Maybe we should invade yet ANOTHER
country paid on my tax payer dime?
To be clear, this is a group of peole that lost their funding, due to lies and
untruths. And some people who comment on this board, celebrate
it. WWJD? I don't pretend to know anyone's faith, but
THAT is truly... UN-christlike.
Re: Pagan | 10:48 a.m. Feb. 15, 2012 "WWJD? (What Would Jesus
Do?)"That's a roll in the aisle with laughter question. We
kicked Jesus out of our schools, believe in separation of church and state, and
then some pops that question?One scoundrel to scammed by another
scoundrel? Sounds like Karma to me.
Pagan,why do you keep posting the "Bush signs $700B
bailout" comment and try to think it's somehow about repubs redistributing
wealth?It must be your steady diet of MSNBC that has left you so
uninformed.if you'll check the treasury press releases, (instead of
getting the MSNBC filtered version) you'd KNOW that only $245B went to banks, of
which $258B was repaid. So we MADE money ($13B) off the banks.Then
you say it was repub majorities in 2008 that passed the legislation? Sorry, it
was a DEM house and a DEM senate that passed the bailout. They took control of
both houses of congress following the 2006 election. Please get your facts
Re: lost in DC | 12:44 p.m. Feb. 15, 2012 "Pagan, why do you keep
posting the "Bush signs $700B bailout" comment"Are
you expecting a credible, rational, clear cut, answer to a rational, clear cut
question? The best you can hope for will be a cut and paste answer or a WWJD
question in response.Should I feel guilty for thinking it is funny
the DeChristopher got scammed?
'Pagan, why do you keep posting the "Bush signs $700B bailout"
comment and try to think it's somehow about repubs redistributing wealth?' -
lost in DC | 12:44 p.m. Feb. 15, 2012 Because it is just one
example... of conservative and Republicans...redistributing tax
payer wealth... into the hands of CEO bailouts. I
thought it was pretty clear. Republicans, are socialists'. Or should we have waited till Bush bailed them out, AGAIN? 'So we
MADE money ($13B) off the banks.' - lost in DC | 12:44 p.m. Feb. 15, 2012 So, I guess that's ALL that happened then, isn't it? **
'Report: Taxpayers still owed $133B from bailout' - By Marcy Gordon - AP -
Published by DSNews - 01/26/12 'Should I feel guilty for thinking it
is funny the DeChristopher got scammed?' - Rifleman | 1:16 p.m. Feb. 15, 2012 You should. But you don't. WWJD?
Not what you do.
I'm not celebrating that this guy's generous donors got scammed... but I
couldn't help but note the irony and the what goes around comes around karma
involved.This "environmental activist" was found guilty in
a court of law of intentionally scamming the BLM lease auction... so well
meaning people send their money to him and themselvs get scammed.The
irony is so thick. They send money to a convicted scammer who's scam was
motivated by the Global Warming movement (which in large part is itself a scam
to make profiteers like Al Gore and others rich) and suprise suprise... they get
scammed.The layers and layers of scams involved in this saga are
interesting. I guess one good scam just leads to another...
Re: Pagan | 1:58 p.m. Feb. 15, 2012 "WWJD?"Jesus
would preach honesty, morality, chastity and virtue. What would Jesus do? Why,
He would condemn pornography, promiscuity, and casual sex.
'Why, He would condemn pornography, promiscuity, and casual sex.' - Rifleman |
6:51 a.m. Feb. 16, 2012 Then, support marriage. :) **
'LDS Church's in-kind donations to Prop. 8 total $190K' - By Lynn Arave - By
Dsnews - 02/03/09 "Proposition 8 was a ballot measure in
California last November that changed the state constitution to restrict the
definition of marriage to opposite-sex couples and eliminated same-sex couples'
right to marry." article It is counter productive to claim
people engage in 'causal sex'... when people actively WORK to deny
@PaganYou asked WWJD and not what the LDS Church would do so why are
you trying to confuse the issue?Jesus told the woman of ill repute
to "go thy way and sin no more". There is nothing preventing same-sex
couples from practicing monogamy either inside or outside of marriage. It just
is not synonymous with that kind of lifestyle.
Re: Pagan | 10:19 a.m. Feb. 16, 2012 Your primary problem isn't with
the LDS Church. It is with religion in general. In one of your responses to an
earlier story you wrote: "While it's true I have well-deserved issues with
religion..."Are people with "well-deserved issues with
religion" really interested in WWJD?