Why don't they send some of those folks who were advising us to get into
this quagmire, like cheney, rummy (I don't know where a trillion dollars
are) or even Bush who could be counted on to mention 911 and Iraq together, even
if he was aloof about any actual connections.Yeah, I think they
should be over there, maybe we could enlist those radio guys who talk tough but
have never fought for their country, they can sell fear and propaganda that
would make goebbels proud.
Obama has snatched defeat from the jaws of victory in the war against
terrorists. There are more terrorists and jihadists today than ever and they are
stronger and more effective, thanks to B.O. Liberals know the cost of everything
about war but the value of NOTHING as we are seeing! Wait until these jihadist
knock down their doors which not only have they vowed to do but are more able to
do it than ever before. When (not if) they hit us again, remember Obama!
Why is that when Bush sent military advisors to foreign countries there was
instantaneous outrage from the left and yet....when Obama sends
military forces there is applause from the left.Why is that?That is an honest question and deserves an honest answer.Any
Obama-fan want to try and answer that?
A Guy With A BrainJust read Happy Valley Heretic to see how the left
is going to handle the fact that their guy Obama is doing this. It is going to
be the same old song of "Blame it all on the right wing and Bush".
Funny thing is, Obama continues to say he will not send in ground troups.
"Advisors". If one is old enough to remember how Vietnam got started,
it began with Presidents Kennedy/Johnson sending in advisors. And what if some
of the thousand Americans there are either captured or killed? Will Obama run
from the fight as if it was Mogodishu Somalia (Blackhawk Down) or will he
engage? Either way, Obama will be in a situation that he and his supporters
believed would never happen. In other words, he will be in Bushs' position
of having to take the fight to the enemy, or run for the isolationist hills and
play ostrich. Anyone who aspires to be President should realize that virtually
every President has had to employ the military in hostle actions. Even though
they likely did not want too. That is part of the job description.
Would you prefer an Islamic State and what that means in the future or would
helping Iraq and the Kurds with weapons and supplies be a good investment. I
think the Chinese and Russians helped Viet Nam and it worked and they sent no
troops. In the meantime who is supplying the Islamic State. It doesn't
seem to be Russia or Iran and it isn't us so who is it?
Having been in Vietnam and seeing how we went from Advisers to more involvement
in President Kennedy's and Johnson's time and processes, this sounds
very similar to their thought processes of the time. President Obama's
idol is one of those Presidents. The way we left Iraq was a Hollywood type of
production not departing with a plan. These people have been fighting for
1000's of years, even within families and sacred religious based wars. DNA
cannot change overnight and even Abraham was told to avoid some of that
environment for the protection of his own family, even though there were some
familial ties. We didn't win in Vietnam and our President at
the time was a disgrace to our country with his integrity and moral issues as he
departed the scene. His replacement wasn't completely ready for that
assignment and gave rise to President Carter's inept Department of State
for 4 years when Iran grabbed our people as hostages. The similar trend of
Vietnam and now Iraq are coming to light. Our country should be run as a nation
and not political parties having one big party not be on the golf course
Mountanman said: "Obama has snatched defeat from the jaws of victory in the
war against terrorists. "That's right "Mission
Accomplished" I forgot that Bush and his merry looters finished this up
clean and simple.@Sfan doing what? Obama hasn't started any
more wars, much to the rights dismay, and their # one supporter the Military
Industrial Complex which has profited obscenely on the Iraq war of
aggression.MM said: "Liberals know the cost of everything about
war but the value of NOTHING as we are seeing!"So when did you
serve, since you know the actual cost of war? Yeah, that's what I thought.
What in Tucket? said: Would you prefer an Islamic State and what
that means in the future or would helping Iraq and the Kurds with weapons and
supplies be a good investment. Awe yes more money for the above
mentioned supporters of war, endless war is great for profit. Got news for
ya, It isn't going to end in a Democratic or Republic Christian Nation, no
matter what your radio says.