What difference does this make?
Clinton herself acknowledges in this article that there are still unanswered
questions regarding Benghazi. That in itself rightfully explains why some in
Washington are still trying to get to the bottom of the attack... why it
happened and why the lack of appropriate response from the United States
government. It's very telling that to this day... over a year
and a half later... that there is still not a single arrest of anyone
responsible for the deadly attack. Obama promised on the day after the attacks,
that the perpetrators would soon all be brought to justice. And yet, not a
single one has. Why not?Given those facts, it's not difficult
to understand why many people still look for important answers. Those answers
will be telling of what kind of national leader Clinton would be. And since she
will likely be the Democratic nominee, getting to the bottom of this tragedy is
even more vitally important... except to those who still have something to hide.
I sincerely hope Clinton doesn't.So yes, Hillary, it does make
a difference. A very important difference.
Isn't is interesting that Hillary says she will not get into a political
slugfest on the backs of dead Americans. That is about all her and the Democrat
Party has done with regards to their criticisms of the Bush Administration and
Fact: 4 Americans were brutally murdered in Benghazi and the President is
primarily responsible for that. Why? Because, contrary to public
opinion, the President's first and foremost responsibility is the SAFETY of
all Americans everywhere. No, it's not to give the poor a phone or to
endlessly extend unemployment benefits or to expand the food stamp program.
Safety is job number one. As Secretary of State, next in responsbility is
Clinton.Period.Duck. Dodge. Bob. Weave. Deflect.Doesn't matter. Someday you're going to answer the mail on
why you two dropped the ball.
@Worf"What difference does this make"None, actually nothing.
You are right. The 30% that hate her will still hate her and the 50% that love
her will still love her. She's actually going to be able to use the GOP
attack to prop up her image. More than likely, she's the next POTUS.
FT, She made up a story of being shot at,-being under gun fire, in
Bosnia.Wasn't true!And 50% loves her?She may become the next president.This has nothing to do with
hate, but wanting honest, upright people for leaders.Too bad the
American people excepts less then honest people for leaders.
Funny that she seems to want to hang her excuse hat on the fact that there
"may" have been some angry people out there attacking the consolate
because of that internet film. Especially when one considers the fact that this
attack happened on September 11. Not very likely. However I suppose that if she
does run for President she might, as a campaign ad, find some Libyan to do a
promo for her saying that he did attack the consolate that night because of how
mad he was at America for that film. And he can end his endorsement by saying
"vote for Hillary".
Hillary Clinton is nothing more than Obama version 2. If you like Barack you
will love Hillary. Same ole same ole. Corruption combined with incompetence
combined with radical socialist ideology. I have no doubt this dim-witted
country will vote for Hillary just like they did for Barack in 2016.
America's best days are behind us...way behind us.
ConcinnityNobody was arrested for the collapse of our economy either.
Ditto:Worth stating again--"Hillary Clinton is
nothing more than Obama version 2. If you like Barack you will love Hillary.
Same ole same ole. Corruption combined with incompetence combined with radical
socialist ideology. I have no doubt this dim-witted country will vote for
Hillary just like they did for Barack in 2016. America's best days are
behind us...way behind us".
I don't trust anything that comes out of her mouth.
Hey "A guy with a brain.""the President's first and
foremost responsibility is the SAFETY of all Americans everywhere"Exactly.And you don't see terrorists knocking over tall
buildings on Obama's watch do you? . . . With how many thousands of
civilian lives lost? That only happens during Republican administrations.And you didn't see him send thousands of troops into harms way
unnecessarily either, did you? You didn't see over four THOUSAND American
service members killed for no good purpose and thousands incurring traumatic
brain injuries who will need care for life."the President's
first and foremost responsibility is the SAFETY of all Americans
everywhere"So why would anyone vote for a Republican to be
@ Gary O:Most major terrorist attacks take years to plan, prepare
for and implement. As such, it's entirely possible, and even probable that
the original 9/11 attack plans were started during the Clinton administration.
But your continued political bias won't allow you to see nor admit that.
You forgot to address the tragedy this article is all about... the
second 9/11 attack in Benghazi which entirely took place under Obama's
watch and cost innocent American lives. You also forgot that a
majority of democrat Congressmen voted for the Iraq war which you are alluding
to... including Hillary Clinton, the next democrat presidential nominee. You also forgot that a president's administration is also
responsible for the economic well-being of our country. So far, Obama's
administration is laying an egg in that department. Average household income has
dropped a double-digit percentage since Obama took office. And the USA now has
the highest business taxes in the world, which is stifling economic
development.You also forgot to mention that Obamacare is in process
of ruining our previous status as the best medical provider in the world.There are many reasons to vote Republican!
Hey Objectified –“ . . . it's entirely possible,
and even probable that the original 9/11 attack plans were started during the
Clinton administration.Yes, it’s probable the attack was being
planned years earlier, when the Republicans were riveting the nation’s
attention on Clinton’s trivial dalliance with Monical Lewinsky, instead
of focusing on terrorism. GW and his “Conservative”
geniuses in his administration had more than enough time to recognize and
thwart the attack (GW was in his 9th month as President). But the Republicans
couldn’t get their act together long enough to actually do their duty and
protect the nationAnd Yes “ . . . a majority of democrat
Congressmen voted for the Iraq war . . .” after the administration lied
to them and the nation about Iraq having WMD’s ready to devastate us.
“ . . . a president's administration is also responsible
for the economic well-being of our country.” Yes, Clinton left GW with a
history of balanced budgets and a healthy economy, and Bush left Obama with
complete devastation. And before the ACA, the US was ranked number
37 in health care by the World Health Organization.Why would anyone
ever vote GOP?
The democrat minions will follow her lock in step. They will never dare ask
questions of their leaders. It's something liberals preach, but, refuse to
practice on their own rank and file.Why would anyone join the
military with democrats in control or any foreign service? The fact of the
matter is, the democrats are made up of leadership from the hippie era. They
believed in making love, doing drugs but not war. They freely had any partner
and actually believed they could live off the excess of society. For some
reason, enough voters were brainwashed into this poverty making philosophy and
actually thought it would work. Now as our nation crumbles and builds up debt,
the only thing democrats say is "forward".I'm just
hoping that a decent candidate comes through on the GOP side that is worth
voting for. Lately they believed that they need to stoop to the levels of the
digressive movement. Time to get real leaders that actually care about the
country. But, that is rare and hard to find. That is for all political parties.