If you don't break the law, you don't have to go to jail.
1aggie:I have a hunch you are trying to imply something. Can you
clarify so there is no misunderstanding?Do you also believe that no
one in history, has ever been falsely accused or falsely/mistakenly sentenced to
1.96:I apologize for my vague comment. However in this forum one must be
somewhat circumspect in choosing what to say if you ever want to see your
comment in print. And vague comments sometimes appear to be more harsh than
what was intended. Destroying other peoples' property is
illegal and answerable in court (now and then). Although Joseph was unfairly
maligned and persecuted for much of his life, this particular arrest was
probably justified. Dallin Oaks has written on the subject and concluded that
"destruction of the printing press itself was probably outside of the
council's legal authority".
laggie,I believe Dallin Oaks will disagree with you as to whether
the arrest was justified. He wrote the article you cited in the Winter 1965
edition of the Utah Law Review. In it, he does state that the Nauvoo City
Council could have been found financially liable for the destruction of the
press. He then concludes with the following:"Nevertheless, the
common assumption of historians that the action taken by the city council to
suppress the paper as a nuisance was entirely illegal is not well founded. Aside
from damages for unnecessary destruction of the press, for which the Nauvoo
authorities were unquestionably liable, the remaining actions of the council,
including its interpretation of the constitutional guarantee of a free press,
can be supported by reference to the law of their day." (pg 903)Yet, for this very action, Joseph and Hyrum were arrested, charged with riot
and treason, jailed, and then murdered by a mob while in jail awaiting trial.
Which was the grosser crime?
Given the life and property taken from Joseph Smith and his family(nevermind the
body of the saints) for much of the Church's history to that point, with
previous false arrests and mistreatment, I would give him a pass if this act-one
levied against spreading more unfounded hatefulness against them-were illegal.
Irrespective of how we view the destruction of the press. The penalty for its
destruction would not have been the death of two men who had not yet even gone
Twin and Northern LightsWho here has condoned the mob action or
implied that the Smiths got what was coming to them? The killing was a
horrendous crime for which some of the perpetrators were tried and found
"not-guilty" by their non Mormon peers in an obvious miscarriage of