The real issue was not his age nor his DNA. The real issue is whether or not he
was guilty of the crime. However, I can't help but wonder if he got a fair
I can understand what the guy wants to do. I understand that history will repeat
itself. I guess I can't understand what this has to do with me, hear, now,
With the lack of evidence, this exercise is not going to convince anyone. Why
do it unless the promoter has an agenda?