I can only speak for myself, but I've been in several situations in my life
where there were no clear lines of right vs wrong! Unfortunately our Judicial
system requires such clarity!I'm certain that GZ and TM were
both feeling justified at the start of this event that ended horribly wrong for
both...Travon more than George. But I can't get it through my brain that
GZ set out to kill or TM set out to beat...As I said earlier, things
in my life have started out small and escalated out of control, several times.
I always spoke of my sure innocents but knew in my heart I was somewhere close
to 50% to blame for the situation.I'd bet money this is the
case here...black and white is rarely attainable except in a court system...that
is flawed for cases like this.I think...
The only thing these people would have considered justice is if Zimmerman was
convicted, guilty or not. In their minds, the trial was over before it even
@ Pipes:They wanted a lynching...which is ironic, considering the
inhumanity that many blacks themselves suffered at the hands of vigilante
justice. This also exemplifies the ramifications that all gunowners
need to realize, because should they ever use their gun, this is a likely
result, defensible or not (being a gunowner myself, I know that I certainly
However, I would like to add that obviously not everyone thinks that violence is
the answer. Like the mentioned Rev. Jacqueline Lewis, who "wearing a pink
hoodie, urged peace and told her congregation that Martin Luther King Jr.
"would have wanted us to conduct ourselves on the highest plane of
dignity." Amen to that.
@PipesAs opposed to the people who thought there wouldn't be justice
unless Zimmermann were found innocent?
@atl134As opposed to the people that would let the legal system reach a
verdict by a jury of his peers.
This is political, pure and simple.The left uses race to bludgeon
conservatives. The left can't allow racism to die. They need that club.
Facts don't matter to these guys. Betcha 10 to 1 that the feds go after GZ
on civil rights charges, a clear violation of the double jeopardy clause of the
constitution.If race were not an issue with this case or if the
races of the parties were reversed we would have never heard of this case.
How many of the people who are protesting actually witnessed the altercation?
How do they "know" there has been an injustice? Do they "know"
how Zimmerman actually felt at the time? The jury know as much as anybody about
what happened and they did not find Zimmerman guilty. It wasn't a hung
jury. If Zimmerman is innocent, would you want him to spend years in prison for
The so called protesters are the same kind of people who show up for every
anti-everything event. And yet the media fails to report that. No wonder readers
are dumping newspapers and traditional outlets in favor of new electronic
sources of information. Maybe that is why the professionalism is gone out of
"journalism", what ever that is these days. Real reporting is a lost
art. Can you tell the difference between the check-stand rags and traditional
(formerly known as legitimate news) media? Even NBC and CNN have stories about
UFOs and space aliens which fit in quite well with the rest of what they
Burning the American flag because they don't like the outcome of our court
of law?Speaks volumes about the character of the people who wanted a
conviction There would have been NO similar actions by Zimmerman
supporters if there was a conviction. I am ashamed to call these
these people fellow Americans from their actionsDisgraceful
Zimmerman may not be guilty of 2nd degree murder, but he is certainly
responsible for the death of Martin. Had he followed the directions of the 911
operator and stayed in his vehicle, the whole thing would have never happened.
I wonder if Rock thought it was "a clear violation of double jeopardy
clause" when OJ was hauled back into court on a civil suit. To me, this
seems the same.
Perhaps people just DO NOT get it.Had George Zimmerman followed the simple
instructions given to him in his direct conversation with the Sanford
Police....Those following the trial HEARD the phone conversation of
Sanford Police telling George Zimmerman, "Do not get out of you car, and do
not follow this individual".Obviously, this is a major factor in the
public's feeling of frustration and injustice. A simple order given
to George Zimmerman by the POLICE.....Angry, frustrated Americans could be
at home today worrying about something else.
@ the rockyour comment on double jeopardy is wrong... better research your
DJ statute before making such comments. I agree with everything JSB said. We
weren't there and we don't know all the facts like the jury did. Its a
tragedy that a young man lost his life and I think we all can learn from this
incident how to avoid this kind of stuff happening to ourselves. Civil
conversation might be a good place to start:)
Love the juxtaposition of the headline of the article "Rallies against
Zimmerman" with the picture of a guy throwing a garbage can through the
Cedarcreek320,I agree with you. He was guilty of manslaughter. And the state of Florida is guilty for a ridiculous law that seems to
tell gun owners to stand their ground and blaze away, regardless of the
ramifications for all others. We are our "brother's keeper." The community is guilty for allowing crime and violence to escalate in
the area. Only a selfish and prideful people would allow this to happen. MANY people have this young man's blood on their hands.
Unfortunately, they will never see the inside of a courtroom.
a lot of people didn't like the outcome of the oj simpson trial either
Further evidence of how corrupt so-called progressivism has become. People
involved in these demonstrations are neither liberal or progressive, as those
terms are properly understood. They are totalitarians, who prefer Stalinist show
trials designed to confirm ideological positions. In their view, Zimmerman
should have openly confessed his sins in court, been duly convicted, and would
now be on a long train trip to the Gulag -- if not already executed.
You don't know what happened, neither does anyone else. Only 2 people
there. The media has been heavily invested in zimmerman's guilt since it
happened. Zimmerman is not whie, so why make it a black white thing. The press
has also portrayed tray on Martin as a prom going beaver cleaver, where he seems
to bhave started on the road to punk hood. His death is unfortunate but nobody
knows what happened that night so don't rail on the system because you
don't like the verdict.
Cedarcreek320 needs to keep in mind that the jury had the option of convicting
Zimmerman of a lesser charge, of Manslaughter. Clearly, they felt there was
insufficient evidence, even for that.The anger in this country over
the lack of conviction, demonstrates a lynch mob mentality. People say that,
when it comes to civil rights, our country has not progressed enough. Perhaps
so. But it is also clear that we have not progressed enough in civility.It is so disheartening to see how there seems to be a constant threat in
our country, of violence if convictions do not go the way they want. First it
was the 1992 LA riots, when police officers were not convicted of beating a
black during an arrest. Perhaps the jury was wrong. But the riot only hurt the
predominantly black community in LA. then there was celebrations in the street
when OJ got off for murdering his white ex-wife. Now more riots when someone is
not convicted of killing a black.Seems like the intent is conviction
by intimidation. Hope it never works. Or, maybe it did, in the case of OJ.
Why can't we just all get along? I grew up in the West and have lived in
the South, race relations are so much more complicated than most of us realize.
The problem I see with this verdict is that the case was so polarized before it
was held by the media and political and quasi-religious figures that the current
events were inevitable. Sad that the pulpits and preachers are
encouraging his kind of demonstration. There is no good to come from riots and
protests. The polarization deepens, the hatred is fostered, and race relations
inch closer and closer to a schism that will spark events no one wants.The religionists need to stand up for the what they teach, and if what they
teach is hate and division then we need to do something about that. This case
was a failure from the beginning, it was and is political, the fact that the
jury was able to make a decision at all is amazing. I am sure that
the jury are now totally amazed at the consternation the country is experiencing
because of their decision. They made the decision based on the law and evidence.
Under our Constitution, trial by jury is the right we all have whether you like
the results or not. The jury heard all the evidence. We did not. The
prosecution did their job as well as the defense. Those who use violence to
protest are out of line and do not respect the constitutional rights given to
all of us. It became a race issue the minute the prosecution began referring to
Zimmerman as a half hispanic half white. We don't refer to Obama as a half
black half white president. By the way, President Obama was way out of line when
he interjected positive comments about Martin while the trial was underway. We
will never rid the country of racism when government leaders or court officials
use race as the excuse for any actions. We need to look at all of us a just
equal citizens under the same constitutional protections and not pass judgment
without all the facts.
Civil and criminal are separate deals so there is no double jeopardy. Also, the
burden of proof is much less. It is the preponderance of the evidence vs.
beyond a reasonable doubt. In the former, all the jury would have to believe is
that George Zimmerman is responsible for Trayvon Martin's death which
could be a logical conclusion based on Zimmerman not following the request of
the 911 operator. Martin's family would win a monetary settlement rather
than Zimmerman facing incarceration.In regards to criminal,
Zimmerman could be charged criminally by the feds for violating Martin's
Civil Rights. These laws came about because in the past, most especially in the
South, Whites were often found not guilty of crimes against Blacks though it was
obvious the parties were guilty. I am not saying this is the particular case
here but it is an option still left to pursue by the government.
@Mark BDouble jeopardy is being tried twice criminally for the same
act. Martin's family is free to sue Zimmerman and I would bet they do. I
hw problen is that none of us knows exactly what happened. The jury heard the
evidence and found "not guilty." Case closed. What is concerning is
the apparent view of many to keep trying him until they get a conviction. That
is exactly what the Constitution sought to prevent.
This should be a lesson to all. When you throw a punch it can kill the person
being hit or you might be facing someone with a gun...who has every right to
protect themselves. I have no idea what happened that night but this much is
clear the media and the tired old PC crowd tried and convicted a man before the
trial and now that same mainstream media is working to rile up as many as
@ johnny moser - I don't think riots help out much (unless a revolutionary
war or a civil war could be considered a riot). But peaceable protests have
accomplished a lot of things. The big peaceful protests of those with black
skin helped make important movements forward with the Civil Rights Laws in the
Absolutely don't understand why my comment was censored, so here it is
again:The protests and demonstrations are overwhelmingly non-violent
and peaceful. But the DN, perhaps in an attempt to assuage the desires of the
extremist element of its readership, chose to select a picture of a violent
incident. This is not journalism.Once again, some are
claiming that protesting is pointless and a poor decision. Clearly, the
Founders of this country thought otherwise as they selected to highlight that
right in an amendment to the Constitution, even giving it the honor of being in
the first amendment. Just because you disagree with someone's decision to
protest, boycott, etc. or you think it a waste of time does not mean that it is.
They, like all of us, have the right to protest. No one has the right to do so
violently. The overwhelming majority of people are not, but the DN appears to
be attempting to persuade us otherwise.
@ Pipes Salt Lake City, UT"@atl134"As
opposed to the people that would let the legal system reach a verdict by a jury
of his peers."My Stake President was a lawyer in my native
country. I always remember his derisive words about the American Justice system.
"A jury of his peers" where a bunch of people with no training in the
law, used to his personal ideas and biases attempting to judge impartially. My
stake President said that the lawyer who was able to present the best show in
court would usually win the vote of the jury. I see another confirmation of his
words.Yesterday's verdict was legal. However, the question
about justice remains unanswered. No Fit in SG, I wrote something
similar to your comment before but our holy brothers in DN considered
inappropriate. I'm glad they published your comment.My comment
also included that Zimmerman had a gun while Trayvon had Skittles and Ice tea,
may be that threw it over the top.
Claudio,Not a single flag woul have burned by Zimmerman supporters
if he had been convicted I am sorry if the truth does not support
what liberals wants us to believe about peaceful good Americans supporting a
conviction We see the character of these people supporting a
conviction. And Zimmerman gets DAILY death threats from more of
those people. Burning American flags I am sickened to
call these people Americans. And hooray for Zimmerman!The truth prevails!
I understand the feeling that people have of injustice, but the facts show that
Mr. Zimmerman had full rights to protect himself even if he followed the kid.
He did not break any laws by following a young man that looked out of place. I
would hope my neighbors would look out for me and my family if they noticed
something out of place. I also think that you shouldn't quote facts
about this case that you don't know about. The "police" didn't
tell him not to get out of his vehicle. This is something the media has allowed
to be misunderstood. They asked him which direction he was going and asked for
an address. He was already out of his car and "looking for an address
sign", when the DISPATCHER told him not to follow him and he said
"OK". Do I believe he stopped following him? No, but that doesn't
mean a young athletic teenager can assault someone if they are feeling like they
are being followed. He had 4 minutes to go home. The Media made it sound like he
was a 10 or 12 year old scared little boy. Treyvons past proves he was not.
The Martin Family needs to move on and get over their intent to file a civil
lawsuit. Who every heard of filing a civil suit when someone has been acquitted
of any crime and declared the case as Self Defense. Had the roles been reversed
Trayvon could have been tried as an adult. Trayvon was the aggressor and
the jury felt he was acting to save his own life; it is unfortunate that this
resulted in a death. But, it is what it is. So many strikes against Zimmerman
with the trumped up claims after the former police chief even got fired because
he saw no need to file any charges. The manipulation to try a case against
Zimmerman was not warranted. It needs to be left at that. No
amount of money nor any further legal action will succeed and is pointless. The
DOJ promoted agitating this case into a race related or hate crime, but it was
Re: Chris BThanks for being the picture perfect example of the
readership I highlighted in my comment. Always a pleasure!
We do not know the full circumstances of this tragedy. Only what we have heard
from the media. What sickens me is that people are prepared to burn the flag
over such issues and use it as an excuse to vandalize property. Preachers from
all denominations such preach forgiveness not intolerance or hatred. The Amish
taught us all a good lesson of tolerance when their milkman murdered their loved
ones a few years back. I would have to ask if Zimmerman had allegedly kill
another white man, would the result have been different. That is would there be
rioting in the streets.
I am also frustrated with the media continually stating that Martin was an
unarmed Child was murdered. It makes it sound as if the teenager didnt assault
anybody. I dont understand how educated people on TV can be so biased. When I
first heard the story I thought, how can this story be correct? How could this
gun down a kid. I listened to the whole story objectively. There was more proof
that this was a case of self defense rather than a guy who wanted to gun down
some black teenager just for being in his neighborhood. Why is it so hard to
believe in this day and age where young people are so disrespectful, hence the
racial remarks by Treyvon. Why can't they see both sides of this and
realize maybe this guy was assaulted. To many facts not known.Could it
have been avoided if he stayed in his truck? Yes. Either way It is not illegal
to follow someone or ask them what they are up to. I think people need to be
more objective and less judgmental. Let the law decide and respect it. In a case
like this nobody will win either way.
Chris, Jim, etc.:I'm not sure I can recall anyone being quite so
gleeful over a case of a fatal shooting, especially on the side of the shooter,
but I guess I should let it go.My advice to your
"counter-protest" is: let it go. To be effective, a protest can and
perhaps should carry the chance of offending someone. If protests are always
tepid and mild, they might be too easily ignored.You haven't
ignored the protests, and that's fine. But we'll make new flags to
replace the ones that were burned, and perhaps we'll turn up a case in
which the shooter does a little dance over the body of the one shot. And maybe
he'll say that the shooting was to protect the country or something silly
like that That might be what it takes to get a conviction. But for now,
I'm....letting it go.
The death of TM and shooting by GZ is clearly tragic in every sense but for the
so called "civil rights" movement to compare this with Emmitt Till or
Medgar Evers is outrageous. Is continued progress needed on racial
issues? Absolutely! However, don't discredit or defame the true civil
rights heroes with disingenuous efforts to stir up emotions.A cause
looking for a martyr is a dangerous proposition.
Riotes are now Rallies. Really
There are a great many in our country who benefit by fanning the flames of
racism, ironic in a day when much of the county is now related by blood or
marriage to people of different races, when the President of the United States
is mostly African-American, when Oprah Winfrey, a black woman, is one of the
richest and most admired people in America. The fences of years gone by have
been torn down, and but a few fence-posts remain, propped up by those cry of
demons and then charge for the exorcism.I for one am tired of it.
Yes, justice can be blind at times, but there is opportunity for
everyone in this country. Do good, work hard, look for and associate with those
who will be your allies, move on from the negative, be it negative attitudes (no
matter their position, titles, robes, etc), negative behaviors (such as drugs,
alcohol, etc.) or the negative thoughts in your own mind. Move toward the
positive, even if it is new and/or uncomfortable.
"58 years and nothing has changed" except 1,000,000s of black college
graduates, scores of black business (wo)men, 1,000s of black Chief of Police,
100s of black mayors, black governors, black representatives and senators, two
black Secretaries of State, black Supreme Court Justices, and a black
president.There is still room for more race tolerance, but, it is
probably time for the NAACP to focus on 'Advancement' as there name
states. This case seems to have been more of an election year flame-up of old
hatred for political gain than a justified outrage. It is much bigger than it
deserved to be.
Moral of the story. If you decide to kick someone's behind, make sure you
know whether or not they are packing heat
This was a case that should have never reached the courts. The prosecutor in
this case along with the county attorney were a disgrace. They knew they had no
case but chose to go ahead anyway. What a joke. This was a tragedy that
has turned into a travesty, and the county attorneys office in this Florida
county should be ashamed of their conduct.I feel tremendous sadness
for the Martin family. I also feel for George Zimmermen and his family. THis
was so avoidable.Most people who have been involved in the violent
protests just don't know all of the facts. The jury has spoken. George Z.
is not guilty. We all need to live with it.
George Zimmerman is responsible for the death of Trayvon Martin, no question.
Also not in question, George Zimmerman created the situation resulting in the
death of Trayvon Martin. Walking back to your Father's home, not a crime.
Neither is wearing a sweatshirt with a hood. George had opportunities to
stand-down, let the police do their job; he didn't, was told to stand down,
but continued to pursue Trayvon. George must have 'forgotten' the
purpose of a neighborhood watch. Keyword 'WATCH '. If Trayvon feared
the man following him, he had every right to do so because George killed him. If
followed you can standup and defend yourself from a person with unknown
intentions, or flee. If anyone was defending themselves it was Trayvon. Fleeing
a better choice, but standing up and defending yourself is not a crime. George
killed Trayvon, you may not think George is guilty of a crime, but he is
responsible, he pulled the trigger. Not a lawyer, don't know Florida law,
but with opportunities to stop, and you don't, and someone dies, you are
guilty of something. And it is much. much more that egregious stupidity. The
jury got it wrong.
Yes, the system is biased. In order to be fair, the system would have had to
hear from Trayvon testifying on his own behalf about what happened and how he
felt his life was in danger.The bias is that the dead are not
allowed to testify in their own defense.The result: a vigilante gets
away with murder... so far.
Where is the outrage over black teenagers killed by blacks in Chicago and other
If this had been an African American who was found "not guilty" can
anyone truly tell me there would have been protests like this where even the
American Flag was burned? This country will never beat racism because some
people will make everything about race and never look at it as a man killing
another man. I was not there, I did not witness the incident and like everyone
else who was not there, I can only look at the evidence provided. By the
standards of the law, the evidence was not sufficient to send this man to
prison. Even I would have been hard pressed to find him guilty. Anything else
about this case involving the DOJ or any other organization is just a way to
ensure that racism never dies.
This is NOT Jim Crow again. This is NOT 1963 again. This is NOT the racial
issue some people are trying to make it into.This IS a tragedy.
This IS a lost life. This IS a test of our justice system and our nation's
belief in the rule-of-law and the concept of "Innocent until PROVEN
guilty".When the Constitutionally required trial by a jury of
his peers is over... it's OVER.The mob should NOT place
themselvs and their prejudices above the rule-of-law and the Constitution. We
have trials for a reason. They asked for an arrest and a trial... they got
what they wanted. It seems like some people would be just as happy ignoring
the verdict and turning it over to a lynch-mob. The Jury has
spoken. Every person in this country (regardless of race) is
"Innocent" until PROVEN guilty. He was not proven guilty.... so he is
innocent (regardless of Sharpton's logic that "Just because he
wasn't proven guilty doesn't mean he was innocent"). As a matter
of legal fact Mr Sharpotn... that's EXACGTLY what it means!
casual observer has a good point. "Where is the outrage over black
teenagers killed by blacks in Chicago"? Where are the marches, where are
the protests, where is the anguish? Why are black people not afraid to walk the
streets of Chicago (instead of being afraid to walk the streets of Sanford
Fl)?Is is OK for black teenagers to kill black teenagers? Is it
only an issue when it involves a white person? Remember... Zimmerman
was found "Not Guilty". This is only about "Race" IF
you make it about race. It doesn't have to be a racial crisis.Our focus should be on denouncing ALL violence (not just this ONE CASE). We
should have the same level of anger for ANY death. Not just ones we THINK had
an element of racism in them.
@PTMSo you admit you're "not a lawyer, don't know
Florida law", yet you unabashedly state that Zimmerman is "guilty of
something" and "the jury got it wrong." Facepalm.
@Pipes"As opposed to the people that would let the legal system reach
a verdict by a jury of his peers."I've seen plenty of
comments on these boards and elsewhere to the tune of "hopefully the jury
won't be bullied by political pressure" as if the only way they
could've come to a guilty verdict is illegitimately. They sure weren't
@Duh"Anything else about this case involving the DOJ or any other
organization is just a way to ensure that racism never dies."Studies show that black and white Americans use illegal drugs at roughly the
same rates but incarceration rates are much higher for black rather than white
people. The vast majority of stop and frisk targets are racial minorities. A
white person killing a black person is found to be "justifiable"
(justifiable would be a verdict like the Zimmerman case though of course
he's hispanic so I'm not trying to imply he's part of these
stats) 4x more often than white on white or black on black killings (and 8x more
often than black on white killings). A job application with a
"black-sounding" name is much less likely to get a follow up interview
than an application with similar credentials and a "white-sounding"
name. Pointing out racism exists is not keeping racism from dying...
the fact that racism still exists is what keeps it from dying. Your (and my)
white privilege is what makes it so easy for us to not see racism because we
generally don't ever experience it.
atl134, Racism exists. Nobody's saying it doesn't. But
he was on trial for MURDER (not RACISM). So stop trying to make this about
"Racism". IT'S NOT!IF he was trial for racism... that
would be a different thing altogether, but he wasn't. This trial was not
about finding him guilty of racism. And by the way... what's
the penalty or "racism"?? Because if there is one... then Al Sharpton
and others are just as guilty as Zimmerman. --------Obviously racism exists. And you COULD say that we are ALL "GUILTY"
of Racism (depending on how you define it). If "Racism" means ANY
prejudice or per-conceived notions about any race... then there isn't a
single human being on this earth that isn't "Racist" (including Al
Sharpton, Jessie Jackson, leaders of the Black Panthers, Zimmerman, Trayvon, and
you and me).Fact is.. EVERY human has biases they have acquired over
a lifetime of experience and exposure to media, people, books, friends, movies,
etc. It's literally impossible to have absolutely no bias based on your
life experience. So in a way we are ALL guilty of "Racism".
"Fifty-eight years and nothing has changed".I would beg to
differ with that statement. African-Americans are in a much better position now
than in 1955. Our President is African-American. How is that so easy to
overlook?This trial was conducted in the media last year. That is
the unfortunate thing; so many alleged "facts" were put out there and
opinions were formed within 24 hours of the shooting.I would rather
have a Justice System that sets 10 guilty men free and one that imprisons even
one innocent man.
@atl134You make good points in your discussion but I did live in New
York and experienced racism from another view, against me. Ever live in a
community where you were the minority? I never treated anyone differently
because of their color of skin and that is the hope we could all live for.The truth about this case should never have been about race. I do not
condone what Zimmerman did, I think it is horrible for anyone to take
another’s life but let's accept this for what it was a tragedy that
could have been avoided. The law in Florida is what needs to change because it
gave Zimmerman the right to react in the way he did and since you or I were
never there, how do we know the truth? How do we know it wasn't self
defense? I agree with what "2 bits" posted. If this was a
black man killing a black man, there would be no discussions, no protests, just
another tragedy. Let's look at all the tragedies as the same and try to
change something about it, which is what I would like to see.
Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman brought something to the forefront of
America's population.What are those who do not accept tolerance and
diversity going to do when they finally realize the facts?America
demographics and population are changing. People with a variety of skin
color and cultures are coming to the United States of America from other places
to live and to stay here. These folks are having more children than the
"traditionally white population". Many of the older caucasian
population, and those raised to believe a separatist type philosophy, are trying
so desperately to hang the past and stop the influx of newcomers.Those who
are having such difficulty accepting the reality of change appear locked in
their prejudices with no where to go.
@BraveSirRobinLet's talk about George Zimmerman and what he
could have done to avoid killing an innocent young man. Maybe then you'll
see Zimmerman is culpable. George is the provocateur. There is no story without
George's blunders. He had two chances not to escalate events. He was told
there wasn't a need to continue following Trayvon, had he stopped, Trayvon
would be alive. He didn't need to leave his car (armed with a loaded
weapon). Working neighborhood watch doesn't give you authority to act as a
Police Officer. But he didn't control himself, and Trayvon is dead. It is
reasonable to assume that Trayvon was unsettled, based on (to paraphrase) the
'creepy white dude' observation. What would you do if you noticed a
car following you, then the driver gets out with a loaded weapon? Try and defend
yourself or run.? Either is legal. And by the way, a juror is going to write a
book, with help from her lawyer husband; so says her agent. Three days after the
verdict and a juror is writing a book; very unsettling. Where was her mind
during the trial? Apparently not on the evidence.
PTMIn answer to your question. RUN. And consider all of the
evidence and bad choices made by Zimmerman you want, it still does not add up to
PTM,Wow, that's a lot of speculation and some outdated
information.That juror isn't going to write a book. Being
sequestered, she wasn't aware of the high emotions involved with the case.
Mistakes were made on both sides. But there was no crime by either
man until TM threw the first punch. Former Sanford police chief Bill Lee said GZ
told officials, that between 7:13-7:17 pm, "he had lost sight of Trayvon and
was returning to his truck to meet the police officer when he says he was
attacked by Trayvon." How do you know TM saw GZ's loaded
weapon? Why would he attack him instead of calling the police? How do you
positively know anything that you wrote about? While GZ had a broken nose and
his head bashed in, the only injury suffered by TM was the gunshot wound,
indicating that GZ was defending himself. As the jurors are starting
to talk, they say a couple of things made it self defense and not murder.1. TM physically attacked GZ first.2. GZ, not TM, called the police.
Where were these protesters after the OJ trial?
Since the Trayvon killing, more then 11,000 blacks have been killed by other
blacks.-USA Today Newspaper.We all know, if Zimmerman had been
black, it wouldn't be this big of a news event.The real racism
come from the media, and some political leaders.It's time, we
the people of America, stop being manipulated by the press.