So let me see if I have this straight; unless a company supports homosexual
relationships they are bad? I have a right to not be a homosexual, or to even
associate with them, just as much as they have to choose to be that way. I am
not their judge, but neither are they mine. I also don't support child
molesters, incest, pornography, teens drinking and doing drugs, etc., but I know
they happen. Those involved feel they have a "right" to their choices.
Just why the liberal press continues to support homosexual "rights" is a
mystery to me.
Worse yet,the company was set up.If I was seeking an employee to
fill a certain need and I saw that they were an activist with groups that are
often loud and vocal I would avoid hiring them. Why should an employer have to
risk embarrassment or worse yet activist behavior from within just to appease
some group?What is so wrong with preferring a quiet, qualified
employee over a loud and equally qualified employee?
Why would even you put that on a job application? I can't think of anything
regarding a position for an oil company where that would have any relevance
unless you the candidate are screening potential employers. In which case you
would probably go work for someone else if your values don't align and you
see that as a problem. If I were hiring someone I would never ask them if they
were gay because I don't really need or want to know. I would be looking
for someone devoted to the job- not pushing an agenda for some other cause.