If schumer and mccain is involve it can't be good.
Rubio understands the problem, and has solid, workable solutions. However, with
Schumer and McCain involved I an sure that The good points will be watered down,
evaded, weasel worded, or easy for bureaucrats to ignore.A bill of
this size deserves lots of time to review and debate, with opportunities for
amendment.In the end, I suspect that the left will ONLY accept a
bill that gives amnesty, and that any border security improvements will never
take place. In that case, the bill must be defeated.The only
solution to our immigration problem is a simple one. Demand that criminals obey
our laws and return home and come here legally. Prosecute those who do not. No
I'm disappointed that there was no coverage of the press conference
expressing the opposite point of view on this issue.Across Capitol Hill at
a press conference that began 15 minutes earlier held by Sen. Jeff Sessions
(R-AL), Sen. David Vitter (R-LA), and Rep. Lou Barletta (R-PA) to oppose the
bill, several members of the law enforcement community expressed their
dissatisfaction with the Gang of Eight bill.
Can you imagine people moving into your house, and using your things. Soon,
you're out of money, and can't support them.This is what
illegal immigration is doing to our country, and our leaders are confused on how
to handle it.How do other countries handle illegal immigration?
It is amazing how the Senate can spell AMNESTY so many different ways. In short
these Senators are again blowing smoke up our pantlegs. The two who are pictured
above immediatly cause suspect. Pay close attention as this is a con job.This is
amnesty pure and simple. Sen. Sessions has summed it up perfectly. I am amazed
the these Senators think that they can continually blow this kind of smoke and
think we will beleive them.
The party of NO will make sure anything gets done, insuring the status quo will
remain in place. They remind me of the story of the man who came to the fork in
the road, but instead of taking the path less traveled, they've sat down
and spent the rest of their time debating with themself on which way they should
Hey, HS what is wrong with saying No. We should have had politicians who knew
how to say no for the past 50 years. We should have said No the last time
amnesty was granted. We should have said No to the boondoggle of the War on
Poverty. We should have said No to the mass of confusion called Obamacare. No
is not a bad work. We should continue to say NO to everything that is not in
scope of what the Federal Government should be in involved in.