Quantcast
Opinion

Letter: Questions for understanding far left

Comments

Return To Article
  • marxist Salt Lake City, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 12:38 a.m.

    These are interesting questions. I am a socialist. I am not a liberal nor am I a Democrat. There are two corporation parties in the United States - Republicans and Democrats. Your list of socialists does not exhaust the list of same. Many fine men, like Eugene V Debs, have been socialists - Debs ran for the presidency 3 times. Look to Debs if you want to see what a "good" socialist amounts to. In no way do I wish to be counfounded with either liberalism or the Democratic Party.

  • Mad Hatter Provo, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 2:01 a.m.

    Well, to many Republicans, the term "Far Left" refers to anyone who doesn't think like they do. Generally, with the recent purge of RINOs from the Republican Party where you no longer find liberal/moderate Republicans like Nelson Rockfeller, Dwight Eisenhower, Thomas Jefferson, and Teddy Roosevelt, the term shows considerable shift in definition with the Right-Ward shift in the body politic. But conservatives today usually say that the "Far Left" are people who advocate "socialism" and "communism" although they don't appear to understand what these political philosophies entail.

    In communist countries like China, the former Soviet Union, and Cuba, the governments could be seen as ultra-conservative, establishing a political elite who profited from the power and financial exploitation of the general public, and corresponds to todays extreme Right-Wing advocates of dismantling our democratic government and establishing a socially conservative society benefitting corporate interests.

    So it gets really confusing. However, for anyone who has had dealings with liberal politics, it is really a hodge-podge of political attitudes, not displaying the ideological discipline of the Republican Party and aligned conservatives. The reasons why it is difficult for Democrats to work together is because it is democratic.

  • Roland Kayser Cottonwood Heights, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 3:02 a.m.

    Someone else who doesn't see any difference between North Korea and Norway. Not that any Democratic politician even wan's to get anywhere near Norway's social democracy.

  • Esquire Springville, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 5:54 a.m.

    This is a cheap smear on Democratic candidates - comparing them to communists and socialists? How can something like this even be published? There is no good faith at all in this letter.

  • Henderson Orem, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 6:26 a.m.

    "How close does a liberal Democrat compare to one of these socialists politically?"

    To Castro? Or Stalin?

    Not even close.

    If folks still believe that Obama is anywhere close to Stalin or Castro, then they:

    A. Don't know what they're talking about. It's a complete insult to those who have actually suffered under Communism.
    B. Have no clue what the GOP has done for almost 2 decades. Bailing out (vitual) car/banking companies/organizations, stimulus packages, and Obamacare? yeah, all were done/were past ideas, of the GOP.

  • LeftBehind SAN FRANCISCO, CA
    Sept. 26, 2012 6:38 a.m.

    So the editorially balanced Deseret News accompanies a question about the 'far left' with a picture of Obama and Clinton? Would you run a picture of the self-described' 'severely conservative' Romney and Ayn Rand devotee Ryan as 'far right'?

    Leaving aside the question of 'extreme', Castro and Stalin are Communists, a system based upon a dictatorship of the proletariat. They do not believe in a multi-party democracy. Democratic socialists, common in Western Europe believe in democracy, and varying degrees of government control of business. The more extreme favor direct government control of many businesses, the less extreme favor tighter regulations on independent businesses. Few Conservative politicians in Europe are as far to the right as their American counterparts, except for the relatively fringe far-right nationalist parties. For example, Conservatives in Britain generally support National Health Care (Britain's socialized medicine).

    Most American liberals would be considered moderate social democrats in most other countries. They believe in democracy and capitalism but also progressive taxation and government regulation. Conservatives in this country believe in far less regulation of business and less taxation, but believe in more government regulation in what some would consider personal moral decisions.

  • one vote Salt Lake City, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 6:45 a.m.

    An extreme unreasonable liberal democrat, call extreme conservatives "socialists" and name calls like elementary scholl children on the playground.

  • T. Party Pleasant Grove, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 6:47 a.m.

    The lefties in the room will be in full denial...but they'll be hard-pressed to find a tenet of Marxism they disagree with.

  • Darrel Eagle Mountain, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 7:29 a.m.

    Listening to a Republican trying to explain what a Democrat is, is often like watching a Baptist preacher describe what a Mormon is...often times hilarious.

  • CHS 85 Sandy, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 7:36 a.m.

    Good heavens. If you're a Korea War veteran, like my father, then you are most likely in your late 70s/early 80s and you don't need someone to answer your questions for you. You can most likely make decisions all by yourself. Just make a decision and vote the way you feel. If a particular party is not to you liking, then don't vote for them. You get one vote, just like I do, so make it count.

  • Twin Lights Louisville, KY
    Sept. 26, 2012 7:45 a.m.

    My sister would qualify as a liberal Democrat (though I would not apply the label "extreme" to her).

    How does she differ from Joseph Stalin? I suppose the first thing is that she has not killed several million of her countrymen nor sent millions more to the gulags. Nor would she ever advocate such positions.

    Please, such nonsense as this does us no good. Some of us are more conservative, some more liberal. This name calling is just idiocy.

    Yes, the president is a Democrat. His chief challenger is a Republican.

    In the US, the Democrats are the center-left party. The Republicans are the center-right party. There are differences and similarities between them.

    But comparing either to the excesses of Stalin, Hitler, etc. is just so much foolishness.

    We need to do better.

  • KJB1 Eugene, OR
    Sept. 26, 2012 7:54 a.m.

    Says Lyle as he enjoys his Social Security, Medicare, and military benefits.

  • procuradorfiscal Tooele, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 8:01 a.m.

    Re: "Many fine men, like Eugene V Debs . . . ."

    Fine men like Debs?

    Hmmmmm.

    You must be talking about someone other than the unrepentant socialist/anarchist felon, who, upon imprisonment for urging draft resistance, desertion, and the overthrow of the United States government during World War I, fomented 8 days of rioting by "unionists, socialists, anarchists and communists," starting May 1, 1919, and who admitted, "while there is a lower class, I am in it, and while there is a criminal element I am of it, and while there is a soul in prison, I am not free."

    If that's the type marxists consider "fine men," it's no wonder they're considered half-a-bubble-off plumb, even by other leftists.

  • Lowonoil Clearfield, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 8:24 a.m.

    Sadly, those of Mr. Tillet's generation usually only see the biased nonsense that is printed on the Deseret News editorial page, and not the much more balanced discussion that follows it online.

  • The Real Maverick Orem, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 8:40 a.m.

    Gotta love it when someone who enjoyed a government paid for education, enjoyed a life where the middle-class thrived because of Democrat policies', who is now living off SS and Medicare, complains about "Socialism."

  • RanchHand Huntsville, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 8:48 a.m.

    I used to be a Republican. Now I'm considered a "far left liberal".

    That's what extremists have done to the GOP.

  • SG in SLC Salt Lake City, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 8:54 a.m.

    This letter illustrates the tendency towards exaggeration and gross over-simplification regarding political ideology, particularly regarding ideology that differs from our own.

    Mr. Tillett (and others) might be surprised to learn that there is not a single, all-inclusive continuum labeled "Liberalism vs. Conservatism" that comprehensively defines all political ideology. Other (often better) means of analyzing and categorizing political positions include "Collectivism vs. Individualism", "Populism vs. Corporatism/Institutionalism", "Totalitarianism vs. Anarchism", and "Capitalism vs. Marxism" (which, incidentally, are both economic theories); and, there are still other continuums that could be used.

    Really, the labels of “liberal” and “conservative” have become almost too abstract and subjective to be useful.

    A deeper, less simplistic way of analyzing political positions can be found at The Political Compass website. I’ve taken the survey there twice, about 4-5 years apart, and both times I ranked almost dead-center on both axes (for what it’s worth). Honestly, I would be very interested to know where several of the “regulars” here in the DN Opinion section comment threads rank on the Political Compass (though I think I could pretty accurately guess for some).

  • Makid Kearns, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 9:00 a.m.

    There are really 2 extremes in the world. Socialists on 1 side and Fascists on the other. There are many degrees between them.

    The same questions that are in the article regarding socialism, communism and Democrats can also be turned to communism, fascism and Republicans.

    There are many stories about how Republicans state that they are for less government and regulations yet at the same time, they want the government to stop that which they don't like, fund the military machine (Government doesn't create jobs) and so forth.

    What needs to happen is for parties to be pushed aside. Look at exactly the issues that the candidates are running on.

    Why must it be that any Democrat in congress is a vote for Pelosi? Is any Republican in congress a vote for doing nothing and letting the country and the economy dissolve away to nothing?

    Let's all just take a step back and look at the candidates and not their party. If we can't ignore the party, then we can't ignore the candidates history. This would mean that Romney would ship more jobs overseas if elected and Obama will repeat 4 years of economic growth?

  • LDS Liberal Farmington, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 9:15 a.m.

    I am an American, a veteran, an active citizen [and active LDS].
    Although I do not consider myself “Far Left”, nor Democrat – I do consider myself an extreme Liberal.
    To begin with, you have been told wrong [most likely be either Joe McCarthy or Glenn Beck] -- Castro and Stalin are Communists – NOT Socialists.

    lib•er•al [lib-er-uhl]
    1. favorable to progress.
    4. maximum freedom.
    5. freedom of action, especially matters of personal belief or expression.
    6. representational government rather than aristocracies and monarchies.
    7. free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant.
    8. open-minded.
    10. give freely or abundantly; generous.
    11. not strict or rigorous; free.

    Be definition --
    Jesus was a Progressive Liberal,
    as were our Founding Fathers,
    Lincoln, Roosevelt,
    JosephSmith BrighamYoung….all ProgressiveLiberals.
    We should be likewise.

    FYI -
    The USMilitary is Social/Communistic.
    Same,Equal - Having ALL things in Common

    so are Families,
    early Christians,
    the Nephites,
    American Pilgrims,
    early Latter-Day Saints,
    So I reckon Heaven is also.

    This may come as a shock and surprise to you [I know it did for me!]
    But it’s the truth,
    And the Truth shall set you free…

    ~ Peace

  • one old man Ogden, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 9:17 a.m.

    A "liberal" is really just a conservative who won't allow anyone to fool him.

  • Ultra Bob Cottonwood Heights, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 9:49 a.m.

    I am a Liberal American citizen because I believe in the American creed. I am a Korean veteran, having served on a diesel boat submarine in the North Pacific near the end of the Korean war. I did not kill a single Korean.

    Republican politicians are likely to define a democrat in much the same way they describe the general population. As cattle to be managed. A liberal democrat would be defined as an unruly bull or heifer unwilling to accept their definition.

    Lyle could improve his ability to understand definitions.

    Socialism: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.

    A better understanding of government would also be good.

    Most all government services fit the definition of Socialism. From the military all the way down to the trash service, the government owns the equipment, employees the workers, and manages the operation of the service.

    Capitalism, Communism, Socialism are economic systems, not systems of government.

    Governments, republics, democracies, dictatorships. and more, may operate their economic system in any way they choose. And may choose several.

  • Roland Kayser Cottonwood Heights, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 10:13 a.m.

    I also recommend the "Political Compass" mentioned by SG earlier. I have taken several political identification tests, most of which put me either dead center or slightly to the left of center. The compass test adds another dimension going from authoritarian to libertarian. On that part I score a little ways into the libertarian quadrant.

  • atl134 Salt Lake City, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 10:21 a.m.

    A liberal might be compared to Canada. A far left liberal would be more like Sweden.

  • Ford DeTreese Provo, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 10:39 a.m.

    So, Des News, why on earth would you publish a letter like this, other than to see how many comments you can get here refuting the silly questions asked? Or maybe you have a secret agenda to expose the utterly ridiculous logic of the far right. If so, you're succeeding wondrously.

  • LDS Liberal Farmington, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 10:55 a.m.

    Roland Kayser
    Cottonwood Heights, UT
    I also recommend the "Political Compass" mentioned by SG earlier.

    =============

    I ran the Compass --
    Fell in the Lower Left quadrant.

    About right on top of Mahatma Ghandi, Dalai Lama, and Nelson Mandela.

    As a side note --
    It was also Diametrically opposed to Adolph Hitler, Mitt Romney and surprisingly even Barack Obama.

    So much for the President being a called Liberal Leftie....

  • Hutterite American Fork, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 11:03 a.m.

    If you go far enough in right field, the centre is far to the left of you. It's all perspective.

  • Ali'ikai 'A'amakualenalena Provo, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 11:30 a.m.

    The real Far Left died from self-inflicted wounds over forty years ago. The radical elements advocating extremist socio-political policies grew up. Many now form the New Right with its own extreme socio-political ideology. Many anti-war, draft-avoiding student protesters have become the capitalist, pro-war, neo-con elitists who led us into the Iraq War. Look around, scrape the surface of today's conservative ideolog and you will find a former "liberal" who followed the philosophy of economic self-interest to fame, power, and fortune.

    Some of the most successful right-wing talking heads you find on conservative radio once considered themselves "liberal" because it was fashionable in the day. Now they can make more money spouting conservative noise because they were always out for Numero Uno regardless of the prevailing political climate. Wolves in sheep's clothing? Obviously, they didn't really believe what they said they believed then otherwise they would still be advocating moderately progressive ideas today.

    So they use terms like "socialist" and "communist" as epithets never understanding what these political philosophies were in the first place. It's all part of the partisan game seeking political advantage.

  • marxist Salt Lake City, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 11:52 a.m.

    "You must be talking about someone other than the unrepentant socialist/anarchist felon, who, upon imprisonment for urging draft resistance, desertion, and the overthrow of the United States government during World War I" Yep, that's the Debs I mean - the guy who had the guts to oppose Wilson's diasastrous entry into WWI.

  • Twin Lights Louisville, KY
    Sept. 26, 2012 11:58 a.m.

    Ali'ikai 'A'amakualenalena,

    First, I would love to know what your screen name means. Seriously - I am just interested.

    Second, I could not agree more reference some of the talking heads (and some of our politicians as well). They adopt the political label that leads them to power irrespective of what that label is. Offer these types of folks a guarantee of continued power on the condition that they switch to the opposing side and they would take the offer in a heartbeat.

    Third, yes there is little real understanding of what some of the labels are we float around. We call people things that we really don't understand and rally for or against things that have little bearing to reality.

  • procuradorfiscal Tooele, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 12:03 p.m.

    Re: "There are really 2 extremes in the world. Socialists on 1 side and Fascists on the other."

    No -- Socialist and Fascists are on the same side.

    Since WWII, socialists have been trying desperately to define themselves out of that box, but notwithstanding disingenuous leftist/academic blather to the contrary, fascists ARE socialists.

    To real people, the only meaningful political extremes are actually responsible, democratic freedom on one end, oppressive, oligarchic, dictatorial tyranny on the other. The means and the ends of both socialism and fascism well into the tyrannical end of the spectrum. Purported existential, regional, and etymological differences are in degree only, not purpose.

    Leftist/academic hair-splitting regarding the manner in which governments count their money or the methods they may use to exercise control over any or all facets of society, including means of production, are transparent sophistry at its worst, intended to hide one or another truth about, and thereby unduly improve the image of, whatever brand they're peddling.

  • HaHaHaHa Othello, WA
    Sept. 26, 2012 12:03 p.m.

    KGB1

    Says Lyle as he enjoys his Social Security, Medicare, and military benefits.

    If you give me and all others that choose to, the option to opt out of social security, like we have demanded for year, then you and yours can have all those precious benefits all to yourselvs. Aren't you all about CHOICE? I bet Lyle would agree also.

    I didn't serve in the military, so I don't get benefits, and don't even know what they are. I have no problem offering benefits to military personnel, to help compensate them for their service. Do you? I know most leftists loathe the military, is that your position?

  • LDS Liberal Farmington, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 1:01 p.m.

    procuradorfiscal
    Tooele, UT
    Re: "There are really 2 extremes in the world. Socialists on 1 side and Fascists on the other."

    No -- Socialist and Fascists are on the same side.

    Since WWII, socialists have been trying desperately to define themselves out of that box, but notwithstanding disingenuous leftist/academic blather to the contrary, fascists ARE socialists.

    ============

    Wrong!

    You NEVER learned that in any Accredited College or University, or standard English Dictionary.

    For the last time Glenn Beck University stuents --
    and listeners of College Drop-outs on the AM radio....

    Fascism is FAR-right wing.
    Communism is FAR-Left.

    The Nazis killed more Communists than Jews, Gypsies, Liberals, Acedamia, Homosexuals, Aborationists, [and every other group of people the Far-Right extremeists deplore] combined...times 10.

    and FYI -- Socialsim would be considered Moderate to Moderate Center-Left, maximum.
    i.e., England, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Japan, Canada, Israel, ect.
    Our closest ALLIES.

  • RedShirt USS Enterprise, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 1:35 p.m.

    To "LDSLiberal" you are forgetting the most important part of the term liberal.

    "of, favoring, or based upon the principles of liberalism " That seems almost redundant, so lets look up "Liberalism"

    Liberalism is defined as "such a philosophy that considers government as a crucial instrument for amelioration of social inequities (as those involving race, gender, or class)" That sounds like big government and social justice to me.

    How about we use a thesaurus with the word liberal. The synonyms include progressive, radical, or left-wing.

    If we look up the political definition of left-wing or progressive, it comes down to this: a belief in government supplying all of the needs to all of its citizens. Left-wing politics embrace socialism, communism, and other collectivism political/economic system.

    So, by following the definition of the word "liberal" in its political context, apparently liberal does point towards government enforced collectivism. If you disagree with me, then you are also disagreeing with various dictionaries too, so, you better write letters to the dictionary people to get them to change the definition too.

    Also, those people and groups you claim are liberals, they were concerned with individual freedom and limited government, Conservatives.

  • Tolstoy salt lake, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 1:44 p.m.

    why do we allow such childish drivel to pas for proper political discourse?

  • Tolstoy salt lake, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 2:07 p.m.

    pass not pas. sorry.

  • procuradorfiscal Tooele, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 3:02 p.m.

    Re: "Fascism is FAR-right wing. Communism is FAR-Left."

    Yeah, yeah -- same old socialist/academic pap, bouncing around in the leftist echo chamber, each liberal trying desperately to convince the next that this is the way to shed that old albatross hanging around their neck.

    That diametric opposition must be why the supreme leader of the National SOCIALIST German Worker's [Nazi] Party and of fascism, in general, said of its roots, that it took ". . . from the materialism of the Marxist dogma, living, creative Socialism." And, maybe that's why Hitler and Stalin concluded the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact between the two nations, brutally and cooperatively divvying up Eastern Europe between them.

    We understand liberal desperation to shine up its brand by shedding the stigma of socialist fascism, even its desperation to disingenuously attribute fascism to conservatives.

    But, it won't work, as it's simply counter to all the known facts.

  • RedShirt USS Enterprise, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 3:19 p.m.

    To "LDSLiberal" I don't know about you, but history has shown us that there are many "college dropouts" that know a lot more about politics than the college educated professors we have now. People like George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Abraham Lincoln, and Thomas Jefferson all dropped out of college, yet knew a lot more about politics than you seem to know. A college degree does not mean you are an expert in a subject, it just means you went to an institution for a few years.

    You also have no idea that Fascists are socialists/communists. The dictionary states fascism is a "movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition." Since conservatives/capitalists want decentralized government and don't want to strictly economics or social that leaves liberals/socialists to fit the mold for fascists.

    FYI, the NAZI party platform specifically called out capitalists as being their enemy, and that they needed to socialize industry. They killed of other socialists/communists to eliminate rivalries, not for political ideology.

  • atl134 Salt Lake City, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 4:58 p.m.

    @procuradorfiscal
    "fascists ARE socialists"

    Mussolini, a fascist, was a corporatist, where power was heavily wielded by big business. That's not left wing at all. I'd say that you can have left and right wing versions of fascism.

    @LDSLiberal
    "The Nazis killed more Communists than Jews, Gypsies, Liberals, Acedamia, Homosexuals, Aborationists, [and every other group of people the Far-Right extremeists deplore] combined...times 10. "

    There were 5 million Jews killed in the Holocaust, while Russia was the nation with the most casualties at 23 million. That's not a factor of 10, let alone the dubious distinction of comparing systematic genocide to an invading army (albeit one that killed millions of civilians). Just stick to the fact that Nazis targeted communists in addition to the other groups.

    @the truth
    "Obama is communist"

    This comment would be hilarious if I weren't distracted with the fact that it's evidence that our education system is clearly lacking if people are so ignorant of what the word communist means.

  • Wonder Provo, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 5:23 p.m.

    I think it's commonly accepted by most people that communism and fascism are on the opposite extreme ends of the political scale, but that's neither here nor there. Obama is neither a communist nor a fascist. If you think he is, I don't know what to tell you other than you really, truly need to stop with the 24/7 Fox News. Seriously. You're making yourself hysterical for no reason.

  • homebrew South Jordan, UT
    Sept. 26, 2012 9:01 p.m.

    Lyle . Its clear from your post that you are terribly misinformed. Turn the channel. Rush Limbaugh, and Glen Beck, or for that matter Fox news is NOT where you should get real, truthful information. Dont be hypnotized by the LIES

  • Mike in Cedar City Cedar City, Utah
    Sept. 26, 2012 9:25 p.m.

    Even conservatives could be labeled as socialists every time they travel on a public highway, or use a public library, or send a child to public school or visit a national park, or call upon the police or fire department or ......I could go on and on but this should be enough to explain democratic socialism...Cause folks, that is what we have for about 40% of our national economy.

    So right wingers, if you really hate socialism stop using public highways, public library...........and etc. ect. ect.

  • Tekakaromatagi Dammam, Saudi Arabia
    Sept. 26, 2012 10:26 p.m.

    "I have been told that that is just another name for socialism — like Fidel Castro or Joseph Stalin."

    Castro and Stalin were/are fascists. Socialism and social justice, etc were/are just themes for them. Think of this as the Shah of Iran rule, or the Ferdinand Marcos rule, or whatever Cold War dictator's name you can think of. Just because someone SAYS that they are for democracy and freedom doesn't mean that they are. Just because someone SAYS they are for social justice or socialism doesn't mean they are.

  • William Gronberg Payson, UT
    Sept. 27, 2012 5:46 p.m.

    Actually Communism, as explained by W. Cleon Skousen, has NEVER existed on this planet. Communism is “The Classless, Stateless Society Under Full Communism”. See “The Naked Communist, Eleventh edition January, 1962, pages 58-60.

    Communism is an image in the mind of true believing Marxist-Leninists and a mirage that allegedly follows their Dictatorship of the Proletariat. The rule of Communists is very real with a body count of many millions. But Communism is a fantasy or a mirage. Their dictatorship is not a fantasy or a mirage.

  • LDS Liberal Farmington, UT
    Sept. 28, 2012 10:50 a.m.

    William Gronberg
    Payson, UT
    Actually Communism, as explained by W. Cleon Skousen, has NEVER existed on this planet. Communism is “The Classless, Stateless Society Under Full Communism”. See “The Naked Communist, Eleventh edition January, 1962, pages 58-60.

    ==============

    Did you read the partner book of his to this one? -

    The Naked Capitalist

    If not - you are only getting 1/2 of the story.
    W. Cleon rips Capitalists to shreds, and fingers WallStreet as being the Gadianton Robbers the Book of Mormons warned us about.

    I'll bet my bottom dollar you haven't.
    Glenn Beck listeners never do.

  • William Gronberg Payson, UT
    Sept. 28, 2012 9:42 p.m.

    LDS Liberal:

    For your information I have not spent more than one hour total in my entire life listening to Glen Beck. Why in the world do you paint me with that brush? Read some of my recent posts.

    Do a search of Deseret News using the name "William Gronberg". I have had 5 letters printed here at the DN in the last 2 years. I do not think I come over as a devotee of Glen Beck or faux News.

    You are correct that I never have read "The Naked Capitalist".

  • William Gronberg Payson, UT
    Sept. 29, 2012 11:05 p.m.

    Thank you

  • Hank Pym SLC, UT
    Sept. 30, 2012 5:07 p.m.

    re: LDS Liberal 9/26 1:01 p.m.

    Actually, this is one of the few times that procuradorfiscal isn't blowing smoke.

    Fascists are socialists. The difference is between Communism & Fascism. C is violent overthrow of the system on behalf of the poor. F is a gradual transition to statism in the name of saving the middle class. The Far right is more elitist, exclusionary, power for the few, autocratic i.e. a monarchy.

    The exception; right leaning Free Market populists who believe in corporations are more efficient than the state. Then, attempt to merge the two.

    p.s. Go read Liberal Fascism By J Goldberg & rewatch the 2008 debates between Barry & HRC if you want a good scare.

  • Wally West SLC, UT
    Sept. 30, 2012 6:09 p.m.

    @ RedShirt
    "Also, those people and groups you claim are liberals, they were concerned with individual freedom and limited government, Conservatives."

    Again. Wrong! Unless, if by conservative you mean.. Libertarian.

    p.s Libertarian is synonomous w/ classical liberal