Thank you for mentioning hygiene and chastity. As with most health issues,
personal responsibility and behavior count more that any medical procedure.
So we need to pay for peoples contraception, but, we can't cover
circumcision? We need to ban sugar and decrease the size of cups that we drink
out of, but, we serve french fries as a vegetable to our children. We
can't use oil, but, we can burn coal to charge our electrical vehicles? We
can't afford to borrow any more money, but, our deficits continue to grow
each year? We need to eat more organic which has issues of E-Coli, and blame
the farms that prevent E-Coli from happening. We need illegals to work below
minimum wage to harvest our crops, but, unwilling to give a living wage one of
our 15% unemployed citizens. We had goals of colonizing the moon, now we are
just studying asteroids. War is not the answer, then what is the answer when
someone wants to kill you and has no interest in peace? Everyone should have a
college degree and have high paying jobs, yet, no society has existed where
everyone has a high paying job (I guess that is where illegals come in).
As a parent, grandparent, teacher, and someone who does free-lance jobs in the
health field, I've not known of any boys who have had problems from not
being circumcised. Why would any kind of medical procedure need to be routine?
If boys are taught proper hygiene and avoid medically adverse behavior, that is
far better than relying on a painful and sometimes damaging procedure.
More misinformation by people trying to defend cutting parts off babies'
genitals. Despite almost no-one in Europe except for Jewish and Muslim families
circumcising, Europe has *lower* rates of HIV.Even in Africa (from a
USAID report):"There appears no clear pattern of association between
male circumcision and HIV prevalence—in 8 of 18 countries with data, HIV
prevalence is lower among circumcised men, while in the remaining 10 countries
it is higher."It is unclear if circumcised men are more likely
to infect women. The only ever randomized controlled trial into male-to-female
transmission showed a 54% higher rate in the group where the men had been
circumcised.Women have "skin folds" too, but we don't
cut parts off baby girls. Think how much money we could save by removing their
breast buds too (breast cancer affects about 12% of women, and kills about 3%).
Re: Nan BW ELder, CO"If boys are taught proper hygiene and avoid
medically adverse behavior ...."That's a big "if".
How many men do you see coming out of a public restroom without washing their
hands?As long as mothers have the right to terminate the lives of
their unborn viable sons they should have the right to have them circumcised.
Good point Rifleman:Taxpayer money is given to women that choose to
have sex and then choose to kill the unborn child, even when it doesn't
threaten her life, health and the child is perfectly healthy. Then
why not use insurance money for this simple procedure?If we can fund
handing out condoms at high school dances.....There's alot of
things that we fund that doesn't make sense. If this is on the decline,
then it will just become cheaper for insurance companies to have it done.
Information has served us well - the huge drop in circumcision in this country
is a direct result of the internet and mothers and fathers becoming well
educated.If the "sky is falling" results of increased
disease were going to happen, it would already be manifesting as the rates
dropped dramatically as early as 1999, and urinary tract infections would be
happening now in higher rates among uncircumcised - yet that is not supported in
the research. We need only to look to Europe and places with
low-rates of circumcision to see that we are not in for an epidemic of disease.
There is always an agenda of those promoting it - either religious
or monetary. Never what is best for the boy.I am encouraged by this
trend and am grateful that education = enlightenment, at least in this case!
Circumcision is no skin of my nose.
Circumcision is not being banned. Some insurance companies (i.e. Obamacare) are
refusing to pay for it. So what? Talk to your doctor. Negotiate a fee and pay
for it. It's not the end of the world.
Cost vs procedure arugment is punitive and wrongfully applied. The only reason
cost will escalate is the losses hospitals will lose int the millions be
transferee to other procedures. The financial impact is only something a
"bean counter" or "economist" would be concerned about and that
make his argument irrelevant to the reason for the procedure. As for
the circumcision, it should be left for the parents according to their religious
beliefs or medical beliefs. There are health benefits to circumcision and I
believe in the procedure. Especially after seeing what many men and I assume
women do not do after rest room servicing. I'd say 90% of men never wash
their hands and I won't eat peanuts or pretzels from a community dish on a
bar counter or restaurant because of it. It is not a choice a grown
man would want to make or have done so as an infant is favorable and the least
disruptive to a boys life. If women could do a similar procedure to rid their
lives of yeast infections I'm sure they would choose the procedure. Move to
I have a tendency to believe the statements made by Doctors Opposing
Circumcision, which you may easily find by searching for them with your favorite
Internet search engine. They have some very decent anatomy lessons, as well as a
Genital Integrity Policy Statement. Most recently, they have issued a response
to the AAP's 2012 policy statment. Everyone should read it. The
"AAP" may be American, but they are certainly not an "Academy".
PS: Also well worth reading is the response to the AAP made by Intact America.
They also, are easy to find using your favorite Internet search service...
assuming it has not been censored from view in your State, City, Neighborhood,
or on-line login classification group...