Okay, the last time I said this people complained at me for being
'impatient'.However, I being a full-on supporter of the D.N., a
pretty big nerd, and a person who isn't complaining in a negative way but simply
wanting to see this 'paper' have success- I hope that people will understand my
complaint in the positive attitude I am sharing it in.-------Deseret News Staff:153 pictures? No problem. Showing a
'film-reel' style progression? No problem. Showing it click by click by click by
click by click by click... problem.The method the D.N. is presenting
content is years behind as far as online standards go. 'Top ten' articles
shouldn't require loading new pages to navigate. No one likes it and it has
other potential problems for user experience. Showing 150 pictures via a slow
picture navigator is also a problem- an easily avoidable one.Some
websites display content very effectively. I don't expect amazing- but at least
not being far behind everyone else. Anyone understanding the backend of websites
today, CMS's, templates, and how extensions work knows that I'm hardly asking
for much effort to improve user experience.
It must be nice to get this much free advertising from your own newspaper and
your own tv station.
@CHS 85Way to find the dark lining in every silver cloud. Just
enjoy the new downtown! It's a HUGE improvment over the gray monstrosity that
was there before, right?
I love the pictures, but it would be so much better if they were in order by
date. One picture is the completed project the next is the construction. Only
the demolition is in order. Everything else is just random. Question.
Don't you have a video of the demolition?Also, I have to agree that
this picture viewer is slow. I think the Deseret News is doing a great job in
the internet market, but it could be a lot better.