Normally Romney would not do any campaigning in Utah, but now that Huntsmann is
in the race it is a race for the LDS endorsement.
Politico: Tea party dilemma - What about MittFreedomWorks, which had
a $14 million last year, signaled it will mobilize tea party voters against
Romney in states holding presidential primaries after New Hampshire's
first-in-the-nation contest. Does this drive in serve tea?
If the United States wants a future we need Mitt Romney as president. We can't
afford 4 more years of irresponsible fiscal insanity.Get me a
president who can motivate and encourage job growth! Give me a president that
believes in this country! Give me a president that's not afraid to cut programs!
Give me a president that believes in freedom! Give me a president that believes
in less government and more personal responsibility!
When Utah legislators (Mormons) pass alcohol related laws that are considered
inhibiting compared to other states, it resonates in the press. When tourists
come to Utah and are subjected to laws that are seem designed to move your
actions and morals toward becoming a member of the state majority it is relayed
to their fellow friends and neighbors upon their return to reality back home.
It is considered normal for adults to drink alcohol, coffee, and tea. When they
are considered less than first class humans here in Utah for doing the same, it
resonates. A Mormon president is impossible to consider when the impression has
been instilled that he will lead all of Americana into the land of Zion and we
will all be forced to bend to the will of the LDS doctrine and Word of Wisdom.
That concept is unfathomable to those of other faiths or even no faith. This
opinion is so well in-trenched that there will never be a LDS president until it
can be trusted that the LDS religion can stop thrusting their morals onto the
general public. In other words, Live and let Live.
@OgdenJohn - Mitt already has the Mormon vote. He's coming to Utah because there
are rich people to give him money here and he needs their support for further
fund raising. It's all about staying relevant. He'll get Utah not matter what,
but just needs to spend some time with people here. It'd be ungrateful to not
visit the town who has the highest percentage of it's residents giving to your
campaign. Huntsman is a non issue in Utah. Mitt is their guy here.
Ogden John:Thank you for your thoughts on why Romney would
"campaign" in Utah.I always thought
"campaigning" in Utah meant Romney was simply stoping by to pick-up
the "donation" checks. Having a Romney "campaign strategy"
for Utah seemed a little political overkill, but the fact that there will be
another guy competeing for those "donation" checks should make for
great political theatre. Liberal Ted:I agree with
you.We cannot afford 5 more years of the irresponsible fiscal
insanity we saw from 2001 through 2006.And not one exclamation
Liberal Ted: Just give me a root beer freeze, a Big H, and fries!
Of course Romney has Utah sewn up. Huntsman isn't vying for the Mormon vote, he
is talking to the moderates and independents. Utah, South Carolina, and Alabama
are definitely not moderate or independent - they are far right. This is where
all other (R) nominees will be hunting for votes. Huntsman will
plan on doing well in any bluer (purple) or independent state (New Hampshire,
Florida, Colorado). It is an interesting strategy, but may carve him out a
niche as the rest of the candidates have moved far right / tea party right. If
he could make it out of the (R) process, he'd have the best chance against
Obama. Moderates & Independents are stuck each year with far left and far
right candidates. It is very refreshing to see someone so independent.
I wish I were half as excited at the Romney prospect as Liberal Ted.Romney's history paints him as a "moderate" at best. And that's how
he seems to be campaigning. It troubles me that he says he supports ongoing
ethanol subsidies, for example. NOT the philosophy of somebody who believes
"small government is good government." Particularly when corn doesn't
need propping up; it's selling at record-high prices.That said... if
the names on my 11/2012 ballot are Obama and Romney, I'll vote for the moderate
over the liberal/socialist in a heartbeat!
Interestingly, I'm not so certain Mitt has Utah "in the bag" this
time. He'll certainly get the big donors and high profile endorsements. But I
don't think he's going to sail to 90%+ primary rubber stamps.Romney
has no foreign policy credibility. His foreign policy is exactly the same as
Obama's and Bush's -- ie 'let the biggest warhawks in my cabinet push me around
into committing our volunteer troops into optional wars and perpetual conflicts
and then quibble back and forth with generals who believe that their mandate is
to beat an entire region into completely unrecoverable submission (including the
majority innocent civilian population). Bush deferred to Cheney until his last
months when he kept us out of an unnecessary war with Iran, Obama has blatantly
snapped years of empty promises and shown no leadership whatsoever on the issue,
and Romney is poised to simply do more of the same.In 2006 an AP
news article quoted Mitt on his father's (George Romney) imploded 1968 lead for
the Republican nomination when his Dad started asking reasonable but verboten
questions about foreign policy. Mitt quipped that even in 68 it was too early to
"be right" on those issues. Yikes.
What else can you conclude? That man knows his burgers and fries!
Fdrfan. How many college graduates come from sugar city?
Jon Huntsman is down 28% in his own State.Save your time, Jon. Utah
belongs to Mitt ... just as the Republican polls show across the other 49
I won't vote for anybody who is a multi-millionaire, period--regardless if he
debases himself to eat at a common hamburger joint.
Love Mitt. Love Big H burgers and root beer freezes. Great combination!!!
build wealthvsspend others moneymittvs barack
He'll end up changing his mind and go to In N Out Burger.
I would prefer to have an individual who look at the issues, think about it,
perhaps have a change of heart, and then decide he has a different viewpoint,
than someone who always believes that his first opinion was right. Think about
that. Sometimes we have an opinion on something, and then something happens and
we have an experience with that particular thing that enlightens us. It changes
our perspective. Should we keep our old opinion or admit that perhaps we didn't
know everything in the first place? We cannot have another four years of Obama
on the job...or should I say Obama pretending to be president?