Not really an option for the cougs. They cant run up the score if they cant win
or even score against the noles. Great teams like Florida, Utah, Texas run up
the score because we can and we are that good. The Cougs couldnt even run the
score up against utah st. Keep trying weaklings.
that is a funny comment considering how poorly Utah played against San Jose
State and barely pulled it out in the 4th quarter; USC only beat san jose state
by 53 the week before. at the same time, byu did run up the score
on a team about equal to san jose state; again, what are you saying about Utah?
>Great teams like...Utah...run up the score because we can and we are that
goodUtah 24 San Jose State 14So apparently Utah can, but
they don't...BYU 54 Tulane 3And apparently BYU can't,
but they do anyway...Consistency. Gotta love it.
Yeah, the Utes have looked REAL strong this year against really strong teams
like SJSU. The problem is can you really consider it running up the score when
you have your 3rd string RB in the game and all your reserves? Let's not get
crazy. Also, Utah cracked the top 10 late last year for the same reason they
don't move up this year. WEAK EARLY SCHEDULE. There is something to be said for
taking risks and winning those big games.
Just a note......Boise pulled Moore in the third quarter and cleaned the bench
in the fourth quarter. Some of the other teams noted above were playing the
first team late in the 4th quarter.
Brad, come on. A blowout is glossy in the short term, but it's win-loss record
that carries a team through a whole season.If always having to blow
out your opponent to impress voters were true in the long term, Utah wouldn't
have busted the BCS in 2008. The 16-point win over Weber State and the 3-point
win over the Lobos--both games that should have been larger margins of victory
for the Utes--would have both done them in.Sure, teams might fall
slightly in the rankings early in the season. But consistency wins out, and
teams who are undefeated or with 1 or 2 losses usually find themselves in the
best position they can find at the end--at least in the current system. Of course, under an even more fair and equitable system, we'd have a
playoff where who's better than who is actually settled on the field.
"Its Not Worth Winning if You Can't Win Big" I am probably the only person in
the universe that remembers that line from the movie! BCS outsiders are under
pressure to rack up impressive wins...no doubt about that!!
ummmm... those two losses were the main reason Utah wasn't highly ranked until
late in the season, and why they never really did have a legitimate argument
that they should be playing for the NC. No-one was calling for the BCS'
collective head BEFORE Utah actually won the game, screaming that they should be
playing for the NC. All the noise came later when it turned out they were the
only undefeated team left standing. Would they have had a better argument had
they beaten Weber and NM by 30 points? Who knows, but I think it is certain they
would have been ranked higher earlier, and consequently ranked higher when the
bowl invites came out as well.
Let's throw out some comparisons here. BYU last week played one of the worst
teams I've ever seen in major college football. I watched both of Tulane's
games (the Tulsa game was televised). If Tulsa had tried harder (opening game
mistakes) they should have scored 70 or more. Bob Toledo has to be ashamed.
SJSU was trounced by USC. I watched that game as well. SJSU played with USC
for a quarter and a half, and then gave up at the beginning of the second half.
It was a completely different team against the Utes. Dick Tomey must have run
their rear ends off last week, and instilled in them the will not to quit, which
they didn't against the Utes.I guess I'm just saying don't spout off about
opponents if you haven't watched the games, seen their tendencies, etc.
Actually watching the games may give you a better understanding of a game most
people really know nothing about.
Here are the % of games decided by 50+ points by seasonSeasonBlowout%19502.41%19512.31%19932.09%20001.99%19561.94%20081.91%19691.91%19971.85%19531.77%20071.76%19911.73%19961.72%19991.70%19541.69%20051.69%20041.62%20011.62%19901.58%19881.54%19741.50%20031.50%19681.47%19891.46%19951.43%19671.42%19751.42%19771.40%19861.37%19921.35%19521.30%20021.28%19871.28%19591.27%19731.27%19701.23%19551.22%19571.20%19941.19%19761.17%19581.10%19781.10%19821.08%19981.03%19801.00%19811.00%19850.99%19710.97%20060.94%19790.86%19630.82%19610.81%19720.80%19650.80%19830.77%19620.73%19600.64%19640.63%19660.62%19840.30%
Utah is the national champ in my book for last year. Congrats to a great
team.To UteFan - you need to stop saying incredibly stupid things
that aren't supported by facts.To Brad - good perspective. We surely
need a playoff system!
I don't think in this regard and this year's polls that the margin of winning
score is so much the point, but that the game was close. If Utah had scored 34
unanswered points, and then gone with reserves and boring straight dives and
punts, that might substantiate an argument. However, since those points and
final margins were not points scored by the losing team during 'garbage time'
with the starting defense already untaped and unpadded, I guess the game was
still competitive and the outcome was not necessarily a foregone conclusion.
And since both Utah's wins were against, ahem, SJSU and USU, well, that does not
say much for either Utah's offense or defense, does it?
BYU did not run up the score against Tulane. They put in their second string
players in the 4th and left points out on the field. Tulane was just that bad
and BYU was just that good.
I'm not sure why the AP Poll is cited in articles any more. It has no bearing
on BCS rankings. If I create my own poll that also has no effect on college
football will it get quoted? I could probably gather a list of voters at least
as relevant as those involved in the Harris Poll (sadly, the one that counts).
BYU didn't play their 2nd string until they were up 47-3 in the 4th. They
actually had Max Hall try to get another passing TD with the score 40-7 (it
didn't work, and they ran it in instead). But they could have pulled the
starters much much earlier like Tulsa did the week before or like Boise did.
To: BYU did not run up . . . Perhaps they didn't run up the score against
Tulane, however that has been the tendency over the past 25 years that I have
been watching BYU. Rarely has BYU not run up the score when they have had the
opportunity and ability. That only says it fits with their arrogance and
entitlement mindset (which is curiously dampened after last year).
I agree that the BCS provides an incentive to run up the score, but BYU did not
run the score up against Tulane. As far as I'm concerned, you don't ever call
off the dogs until you hit 40 points (look at TCU's 30-14 victory that looks
closer than it was because they put the scrubs in when it was 30-0). Once you
are in the 40's, aggressive passing and trick plays with your starters rather
than putting in the scrubs is running up the score. Once BYU hit 40 points they
scored on defense (what was Pendleton supposed to do, just fall on the ball?)
and with their second and third stringers (again, do you expect the offense to
just take a knee on every play or run draws?). There was ten minutes left in
the game and BYU did everything it could to show respect to Tulane, but still
scored a couple of touchdowns. Who cares? That's a cheap shot Rock and you know
The AP poll is getting more recognition in newspapers because the voters in the
ap poll actually vote. Many of the Coaches that vote in the USA today poll have
come out an said that they have assistants do the voting for them, because they
can't watch the games. The AP poll is more accurate in my opinion than the
coaches poll for this reason. The Harris Poll isn't released until the BCS Poll
There is no "running up the score" in the the 1st 3 qtrs of football. The tdS
pulled their starters in the 4th. Max Hall's 4th qtr pass was one of those
short-gain 5-yd routes. You can't run the ball every play of the quarter. You
have to keep the defenses honest. It's not like he threw deep downfield.The "why?"'s defense did a superb job in winning the field position
battle and creating turnovers against an inept C-USA team. Those facets of the
game are all a part of football and the contributing factor to all those 4th qtr
To LaVar,I'm assuming you are a Ute fan right, and you've been
watching BYU football for the past 25 years! Wow that seems kinda odd. As a
cougar fan I must thank you for your support over those years of "watching" BYU
football. I know that during the Crowton era we did run up the score to try and
get into "bigger" bowl game. But we more than paid our dues the years that
followed for our "arrogance and entitlement mindset" that ONE year. Again thank you for your support of BYU football and I hope that after our
"dampened" year last year you will also forgive us. Hopefully your next 25 years
of supporting, I mean "watching" BYU football will be just as enjoyable as the
last 25 were.Cheers,OhioBYU
You wanna talk about dirty play? How about an on-side kick when the team is up
43-0? Getting flipped off by the opposing coach is absolutely deserved.I actually think both BYU and the Ute players are all classy guys and
generally very congenial towards each other. As for Ute fans... you guys speak
for yourselves. Just read the boards.
Who's this ute fan? Is he the typical ute grad that you have to get him off your
property by paying him for the pizza? utah needs to worry about
winning games period. utah had a hard time winning last year. In fact, they were
lucky in 3-4 games last year that they should have lost & were even outplayed in
two of them- Oregon St. & TCU.BYU just needs to worry about winning
too. The only difference is that BYU plays a much tougher schedule than the
BYU's touchdown to get to 47 came from the defense. The 2nd string offense was
already warming up during the Tulane possession.
I will admit that when Crowton was the coach, the score would sometimes get run
up, but with Bronco at the helm, he does not run up the score. He has too much
class for that. He just like any coach in the US wants to see what his back ups
can do, but there were only 2 passes thrown by Reilly Nelson and we had second
and third string players in on both sides of the ball.And for those
short memory Utah fans out there, can anyone say onside kick against Wyoming and
up by a huge margin?
The top ten teams in the nation don't have to run up the score to get noticed.
In fact, it is the opposite. In order to not embarrass other programs, they have
to tone it down at the end of each game.Oh Brad Rock, you silly Ute
fan. Guess it's hard to find a knock on BYU these days. At least you tried to
attach your argument to something we all hate, the BCS.
Coach Mike Leach, Texas Tech, says: "We throw the football for four quarters,
generally with our #1 quarterback. Now that you know what we do, stop us!"
I'm sick and tired of hearing about Utah running up the score. Did we run up
the score on UNLV in 2007? Behind Brian Johnson, Paul Kruger, Stevenson
Sylvester, and the rest of the team, we chose not to score at all and let UNLV
chalk up 27. What more do you want from us?
Who is stupid enough to run an onside kick when they are up 40-0?
This article brought up some good points. I think that the margin of victory
only comes into play when you're talking about two or more undefeated teams. If
a team has to explain a loss, the undefeated team is always superior. A one
point win beats a one point loss. Personally, I completely support running up
the score. If a team is rewarded for doing so, which they are under the current
system, then they need to do it. Look at the Utes' game last year against Weber
State. Utah was up 37-7 in 4th quarter. Whittingham puts in subs and Weber
scores two quick touchdowns at the end of the game. After reading articles
about the game, you would have thought that Weber won. McBride was ecstatic and
said that even though they're a lower division school they can play with the
Utes. He also said that if the game was ten minutes longer Weber might have
won. If teams like Florida, Texas and USC feel the need to run up scores then
it's much more important for MWC teams to do it against non-conference teams.
You're wrong about one thing (at least). The touchdown that put the score at
47-3 was a fumble returned for a touchdown by the defense.
It's not necessary to run up the score. Just win all your games and you will be
fine. No non BCS team will ever play for the national championship... the powers
to be will not let it happen.
that BYU intentionally ran up the score. That said, it unfortunately is indeed
important for rankings--and, therefore, BCS or NC consideration--to beat a weak
team handily, and I agree with another comment that 40 points is a good goal if
it can be achieved early in the fourth quarter. I didn't think
Crowton ran up the score. He did the onside kick (which Utah State had done to
BYU the previous week) against Air Force, which DeBerry didn't like but
indicated Crowton's thinking that he wanted to get a quick jump on the Falcons
because of BYU's suspect defense. Mendenhall definitely doesn't run up the
score intentionally. One coach that DID run up the score was Boise State coach
Dan Hawkins (now at Colorado). BSU's starting quarterback threw a final
touchdown pass at 3:45 left in the game at Provo to make the score 50-12. I
remember thinking that BYU team couldn't feasibly have been considered a threat
to come back and win the game down 43-12 midway through the fourth quarter.
Anyone who says BYU ran up the score during the Edwards era is insane. I
remember, in particular, back in 1990 when Detmer won the Heisman. In a number
of games he would have around 250 or 300 yards passing by halftime, and would
always be sitting on the bench for the last quarter or quarter and a half. I was
always thinking during the year that if he were left in for the whole game each
time they played, the records he set could have been way out there. That was
always the case with an Edwards-coached football team all the years that I
followed them. In other words, there should be no argument for BYU doing it
before Edwards retired. Saying they have done it for 25 years is ridiculous. You
"Utah is the national champ in my book for last year."And I also
forgot to mention that John McCain is our President in my book.
Lavell DID run up the score. He was a good coach, but you can't revise history.
Crowton ALSO ran up the score. His penchant to run up the score
actually cost him the 2003 Stanford game in Provo. Ha ha!Mendenhall
didn't run up the score and/or pad stats against Tulane, but he DID last year vs
UCLA and Wyoming.You gotta call a spade a spade.
"...then climbed to seventh after slaughtering Tulane. Fair enough. The Cougars
saw the need and the opportunity, and seized it."Hey Rock, did you
write that part because that's what Bronco said after the game? Yeah, I don't
think he ever said "we saw the need and opportunity and seized it".Tulane just isn't very good and BYU is very good this season. So a lopsided
blow-out was the result.Rock, when you learn to quit making up stuff
you'll be a better writer.
Edwards? Really? Examples please. Trust me, I went to BYU games for 15+ years
while Edwards was coaching and he went out of his way to not run up the score.
What is your opinion worth anyway? You're a Ute, and you live in Philly. I'd say
your anti-BYU bias has clouded your mind. You gotta call a Ute fan a Ute
fan.Re: Coug Doc"Utah is the national champ in my book
for last year."That's why your book didn't sell very many copies.
I believe Lavell admitted as much. In the early days of the Lavell era (70's,
early 80's), BYU had to run up the score against lesser opponents. It was the
only way for BYU and the WAC to get any kind of media attention and respect.In the mid-to-late 80's, you had a few things working to keep blowouts
in check:1. Lavell/BYU no longer needed blowouts to get votes - just
convincing wins.2. The conference had improved enough that you didn't have
the same quantity of blowouts.3. 2nd and 3rd teams from the conference
were locked into automaic bowl bids. Now, with the BCS system, the
computer rankings play a much bigger part. And a 1 or 2 TD margin over a weak
opponent will hurt you. And with the non-BCS schools competing for 1 possible
at-large slot, Boise State, Utah, BYU, etc. will need to run up the score
Great article Brad! Your stuff this year has been really fun to read.
Especially the "Chill out, Y fans!" Loving your stuff this football season.
Mendenhall didn't run up the scores in the UCLA and Wyo games. He pulled his
starters about the middle of the 3rd qtr in both games. BYU's subs on offense
scored the final 10 points against UCLA. And why is a ute fan
bagging on BYU about scoring a bunch on an AQ-BCS team anyway? U guys should be
happy we did that. Makes our conference look better. I think your ute fan
twisted-pretzel logic is rearing its ugly head again.
Stop with BSC blame.
Lavell didn't run up scores in the 90s, that's for sure. I remember several
times the 2nd or 3rd team offense was within the 5 yard line in blow out games,
and he would make them take a knee to run out the clock. Always infuriated me.
It's not running up the score if it's your back ups. If they have a chance to
score, you let them so they know what it's like and have the confidence they can
if you have to rely on them later.Crowton didn't run up the score as
much as people like to say he did. A lot of those blow out games his first year
saw Staley and Doman sitting on the bench mid-way through the 3rd quarter. How
is that running up the score?Mendenhall doesn't run up the score
either. BYU's offense is pass happy, but when they have had a big lead under
Bronco, they largely go to running plays, which, of course, tend to run more
time off the clock.If your team sucks and can't keep the other guys'
backups from scoring on you, too bad.
Rock offers Air Force's 72-0 win this year as an example of running up the
score. Yeah right. They run the ball all game long. What are they supposed to
do when they get a big margin, start throwing the ball? Now that would be
running up the score. I had season tickets to BYU for over 20 years, during the
glory days, and they ran up the score, and they continue to do it. The problem
is people thinking there's something wrong with that. If you are trying to
score when you're up, isn't that running up the score? Of course it is. The
only way you aren't running up the score is when you aren't trying to score.
Enough of people proclaiming that their coach would never run up a score. of
course they do. Utah and BYU do it, so does Weber State, and Utah State would
do it if they could. That's what you practice all week for, to score. A coach
has never sent offensive players onto the field and told them to not score.
Unless someone is doing this, they're running up the score.
Article quote: "The Utes won both games, 35-17 and 24-14, respectively. They are
now on a 16-game win streak, the nation's longest. But that's not good enough
for the voters in the AP poll, because the Utes are dropping even as they win.
They started the year ranked 19th, rose two spots after beating USU, then fell
to 18th after beating San Jose State."Same thing happened to BYU in
their 1984 National Championship year....beat a lesser regarded team by a
comfortably decent margin and then they'd end up dropping in the polls.Makes no sense at all.
I don't understand why coaches and players should be asked to "make it
respectable" or take out their starters. Play the game to win. Don't play to
make the other guy feel good. If you're not going to give it everything you
have, then don't do it at all. Why would a coach be asked to pull
back? To make the other team feel good about its efforts? To not embarass the
opposing players? What does that accomplish? Stupidest article I've ever read.
If the game is 60 minutes, then play 60 minutes. Mercy rules went
out the window when you graduated from elementary school. Quit believing that
everyone owes you something. We don't owe you anything--Including taking it
easy on you during a game. Grow up, or take your purse and go home.
Your article has holes. Big ones. What about college basketball? Does the BCS
cause blow outs in college basketball? How about the NBA? Is that the fault of
the BCS? Is the BCS game to blame for my work league team getting shreaded?Perhaps some teams get blown out because they're not as good. Ever think
of that?Trevor Johnson is right
Utah didn't get respect last year because they got lucky twice and should have
lost. Everyone knows that Oregon St. had the Utes beat, had there not been a
questionable call in the endzone. And as for TCU, how many times will a kicker
miss a chip-shot TWICE and cost his team the game? 11-2 Utes last year and you
HOW MANY BCS bowl games or "BCS" type bowl games did lavell edwards teams go
to?Just 1. the cotton bowl.
"Mendenhall didn't run up the score and/or pad stats against Tulane, but he DID
last year vs UCLA and Wyoming."BYU 59 UCLA 0No points
scored in the 4th quarter, last touchdown at the end of the 3rd was by Wayne
Latu (a backup) on a 2 play (both runs) 16 yard drive after another forced
turnover. Last pass for Hall came at the 7:43 mark of the 3rd. Doesn't sound
like running up the score to me.BYU 44 Wyoming 0Only a
field goal scored in the 4th. The 3rd quarter only had 1 Hall TD to Unga and an
interception returned by Nixon. Last pass for Hall 5:50 mark of the 3rd. BYU's
2nd & 3rd string QB's played in the game. Doesn't sound like running up the
score to me.When teams turn the ball over 4-6 times giving short
fields or immediate scores to the opposition you have to expect a lopsided
BYU DID run the score up on Tulane. They run it up as often as they can.
They've been doing it for decades. Given the opportunity they would score 100 a
week. The excellent part of this, when they lose in a lopsided score the
boobirds come out and complain in top form.Good form BYU.
"RE: NevadaCoug | 6:43 p.m | 9:48 p.m. Sept. 16, 2009 HOW MANY BCS bowl
games or "BCS" type bowl games did lavell edwards teams go to?Just
1. the cotton bowl."You are RIGHT??? - the Fiesta Bowl (1974) isn't
a BCS type bowl? - come on do your research before you spout off with your
The only thing Bronco Mendenhall needed to do last Saturday to be as classy as
Kyle Whittingham was call an onside kick after the last touchdown. That one
finger salute from the Wyoming coach is still priceless to this day.
Why are BYU fans apologizing for the scoreboard? Do I want BYU to run up the
score and blow everyone out? Of course! If BYU wins every remaining game 54-3,
there's no doubt in my mind they play for a National Championship. If they go
undefeated, but squeak by SDSU and NM, they'll be lucky to play in the Orange
Bowl. Urban Meyer has figured this out and that's the reason Florida challenges
for a NC every year...just watch the FLA-TENN scoreboard this weekend.
So running up the score is the topic the Utes have to whine about this week.
Even when BYU does well and has impressive wins, there has to be something to
complain about. If BYU has a close win it wasn't a big enough win. If BYU blows
out an inferior team they were running up the score. "Yeah, BYU has been running
up the score for three decades. As a Ute fan, I have no doubt of this." Please.
Get a life people.
One or two bcs type bowls in 29 years,and I don't have the clue?
Winning big does not necessarily equal running up the score. All of you who
claim some teams regularly ran up the score - did you check when the starters
were pulled? Did you check starter/sub pass/run ratio? Opponent's late
fumbles/interceptions? Late short passes (have to keep the defense honest and
the chains moving) that turned into long gains?When you pull your
starters and change to more conservative play calling, it's not running up the
score even if you continue to score. Running up the score is when
you keep your starters in the 4th quarter and continue to throw bombs or try
trick plays when already up by 40+.
Dude, nobody has anybody beat until they game is over Osu and tcu had to learn
that the hard way
Urban ran up the score (as did Edwards), and said it was sad that he had to do
so.... do I think he was sorry... nope!!!! Do I think he was right...
Absolutely!!! YBU should run it up every chance they get, as should Utah and
TCU... except for against each other, unless one of said teams has multiple
losses. that's how the stupid BSC works now!!PS. Good Luck Utes...
don't screw it up YBU (for a Ute lifer thats as close as I can get to