Ben Brantley in the New York Times gave this musical one of the best reviews
I've seen out of the Times in the last twenty years. I can't wait to see this.
Some may not like it, but The Book of Mormon has legs!!!!
Nothing like an irreverent 'poke in the eye' as a missionary tool. I'm sure the online missionaries have a plan to capitalize and leverage the
'bump' in interest to the LDS faith because of this production.
Quite the nice review.Not exactly what the typical DN viewer was
hoping for.Let the spinning begin.
I admit, I have not seen this. But I want too.
I saw it two weeks ago. It was brilliant. Two pretty offensive songs, but
otherwise it was amazing. As an active Mormon/Returned Missionary i can attest
that it got missionary attitudes spot on. Highly recommended.
SO MUCH to comment on, but I will limit it to this.From
article:" They've heard jokes about raping babies and songs with
unprintable lyrics. A running joke has a man complain about maggots in his
scrotum.Silly? Yes. Smart? Yes, actually. If there's such a thing as
an intelligent sophomoric musical that the whole family can enjoy then writers
Robert Lopez, Trey Parker and Matt Stone have successfully stalked it and put it
in a headlock.""Smart? Yes....that the whole family can
enjoy" Apparently, the writer of this article is seeking to be
as completely ridiculous with their shock factor as the writers of the
musical.Because as we all know, there is nothing more
family-friendly, or 'smart' and 'intelligent' than raping babies.
The sooner the touring production of this is up and running in Salt Lake, the
better. Although it may be awhile. This sounds like it might run longer than A
I'm not a Mormon nor have I ever felt drawn to be one. But I love living in
Utah because of the extraordinary civility of so many people here. This, I
know, is due to Mormon values. The latest example is the Church's response to
this musical: calm and unperturbed.Sound criticism and/or parody of
any institution is, to me, always welcome. But when it's loaded with curse
words and toilet humor, I begin to wonder if the "critic" really has
any point beyond shock value.Shock value has a very short shelf
life: you can only go so far with it before it wears thin. But sincere
spiritual values can expand infinitely. The Church's values will outlast
Parker's and Stone's because there are real nutrients in the former--things you
can grow on. But there's no real nourishment in the latter, only some catchy
I have problems with this 'Shock' concept. Then again, I have problems with
man's inhumanity to man but I know it works to contrast our Spiritual Values. I
pray that all things can be used for the Spiritual Growth of all who seek it.
I'm not sure I'm humanly capable of lending the needed sympathetic ear. I will
offer to hold your cloak while you stone them. Maybe a Damascus Road experience
is coming for some.
Personally, I wonder when somebody will do a "zany" production (movie,
etc.) about the ex-Mormons and/or Mormon critics out there. I mean, some of them
have an unhealthy, (at times cult-like) obsession of all things Mormon. I can think of lots of funny things to put in it. We can simply call the
@A Man's Perspective, it wouldn't be worth the trouble, and it certainly
wouldn't be in good taste.
Wow, just Wow! First, the Desnews implies its ok to ignore the laws of the land
(i.e. illegal immigration). Then they have articles saying the Book of Mormon
didn't take place in the United States (per Micheal Ash's article), even though
Joseph Smith, the D&C, and the very words in the Book itself point to the
USA. Now it's OK to see an r-rated play. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, do articles
on the Word of Wisdom, Tithing, and the law of Chastity!!!!
1 Nephi 8:33-34And great was the multitude that did enter into that
strange building. And after they did enter into that building they did point the
finger of scorn at me and those that were partaking of the fruit also; but we
heeded them not. These are the words of my father: For as many as heeded them,
had fallen away.
There is nothing in the Book of Mormon that forces it to have taken place in the
United States. Joseph Smith was fully open to the possibility that ruins in
Central America related to the Book of Mormon.It is clear that some
people have substituted their own interpretations for the truth. The truth is
that the Church has no position on where the Book of Mormon took place, and has
in all public statements on the matter said explicitly that the location is not
revealed nor a matter of doctrine. Thus to claim that the Book of
Mormon requires a specific location is to set oneself up at odds with the
teachings of the Church. Some people mistakenly see this as only a
threat on the left. However President Kimball warned of those who trust in
missiles instead of the Kingdom of God. Patriotism can, if taken to extremes,
become a "false god we worship". So too does a particular
interpretation of scripture when we use it as a curmudgeon to beat those who
have taken seriously the Lord's admonition to seek knowledge by study and faith.
Contrary to some claims the Deseret News is not endorsing this musical with this
article. That is a shallow reading of the article. The point is to show what
type of coverage is occuring, not to advocate a certain action.If
this production had used Catholic priests instead of Mormon missionaries as the
central figures in its attack, I would actually be more vocal in attacking it.
I would be just as disguested and revolted by the evil of the production, but it
is always better grou8nd to stand on when you defend a third party.As have many other defenders of the truth I will add my voice to the fact that
there is no middle ground. Either Joseph Smith had the gold plates and
translated them, or he was a liar and a charlatan. The notion of the Book of
Mormon being "beneficial fiction" does not work. It is either true,
or the work of liars. I affirm that it is true, but if you reject its truth,
you can not accept it as other than deceptive fiction.