Perhaps Senator Robles should read some of our federal laws before attempting to
violate our constitutional government. The federal labor laws state that no
illegal aliens, including those renamed immigrant to muddle the issue, cannot be
employed in the Untied States by any company, business, or government. They are
not even allowed to open a business by our state laws. Robles better
learn she represent citizens of america, not illegal foreign nationals from
Mexico. Her being a Mexican does not give her the right to represent illegal
Mexicans who she can't even identify or name. She is representing ghost foreign
occupation by ghost residents. These ghost residents are a curse and a plague
for the economy of the State.Robles cannot write a state laws to
invalidate any federal laws which this one of his is attempting to do.This bill is violating federal labor laws as well as federal immigration laws,
a double whammy criminal attempt to save the illegal from deportation and use
Utah as a sanction state to hide them from the federal government.This bill and all like it are in complete violation of the constitutional laws
and rights of citizens of this country.
Calling Robles' bill bipartisan because it has support from the Sutherland
Institute is wishful thinking. In a legislature dominated by Republicans, the
bill has no chance for success if it doesn't have support from Republican
lawmakers. Nothing written in this article leads me to believe the bill has
support from any Republican. Ironically, if Robles' bill becomes a national
model as suggested here, it will have to do so without being passed in her own
National model? I hope not!
At last some sanity with the hard work of Luz Robles! One has to
wonder, with today's hard-line Republicans and the tea-party bullheadedness in
Utah, will reason ever prevail here in the state?Fortunately, the
Utah delegation to our nation's Senate and Congress hardly ever prevails upon
the more rational approach to lawmaking in Washington. Would the
Declaration of Independence have ever won approval had it's signers been of the
mind as most of Utah's politicians? I think not.By the same token,
would the Constitution have ever won a majority of votes if the current
non-negotiating, uncooperative, unrelenting approach of our state's politicians
had represented the majority of thinking in 1883? The answer to that is a
resounding NO!More power to you, Luz Robles!
National model? of what? Insanity?
"Because immigrants would be required to carry their permit on them at all
times, Robles' believes the bill would help law enforcement weed out
criminals."And when would they be asked to show this permit??
Would law enforcement have to have some reasonable suspicion that they are
immigrants required to carry the permit? How is that DIFFERENT from
the provisions of AZ's law all the liberals call RACIAL PROFILING? This bill,
in practice, would require just as much racial profiling as AZ's law. Of
course, I don't believe it's racial profiling, but those who want amnesty for
illegals ignore the same basic requirement in Robles amnesty bill they call
racist in AZ's bill - hypocrits.No way this thinly veiled amnesty
bill gets trough the Utah legislature. The Sutherland Institute must be heavily
dominated by businesses who use cheap illegal immigrant labor.
Sen Robles bill flies in the face of federal regulations. This is another if
passed will end up in the courts.Illegal is Illegal any way you
slice it.Make the Legal Methods simple and Quick and all will use
them. Make them Difficult and Impossible and only those that play the game will
comply.Immigration needs radically simplified.Enforcement
needs practical methods that are enforced on ALL immigrants, EVEN CURRENT
ILLEGALS.Close the Border. Get rid of USCIS and Dept of
States Immigration VISA Systems. Merge their functions with The US Customs
Service. They all handle different portions of the process. That will
streamline and shorten the process.Register all immigrants here
illegally at local customs offices (traditionally the post office, they need
justification and funds).I know most would say this is insane and
not possible.Our country does not have the money to support the
continued inefficiencies of government. Streamlining is required to fix the
budget alone. We need comprehensive real fixes.Root out
Members of Government that are causing inefficiencies and take their pensions
from them for their contributions to these issues, being part of the problem and
not part of the solution.
Have two systems. Immigrants Immigrating to the US Permanently. and
Immigrants (Workers) that are transient. The second are not here
permanently. Also any and all children of Transients are NOT American Citizens
Period.Legalize the process and streamline it all.Add
residency requirements just as current citizen process requires with maximum
time limits that are monitored in a mandatory employment monitoring system
A national role model? It goes to show you how out of the loop Robles is. No one
will even consider her model. I hope no one else in the nation views this. We
are already the laughing stock of America for allowing illegals to drive.
Like always reward the ones who broke the law! If you let the ones already here
stay they have won!
Re: ". . . bill could become national model."Yeah, for
illegal, sanctuary-movement-based, amnesty laws.This is nothing new.
Nothing innovative. Nothing on which any model should be based.It's just the same tired "progressive" agenda.The only
thing new is the political spin.
The details are not as important as the process. Someone is thinking outside
the box. There are solutions that do not lead to either another Reagan Amnesty
or the Great Wall. When someone from the other side offers a creative idea,
maybe it can lead toward a solution.
This can only be a national model as an example of what NOT to do!This is not an attempt to fix the problem of illegal immigration, it is an
amnesty scheme and nothing more.Giving out permits to illegals and
then getting tougher on employers is ridiculous.This would be like
trying to reduce bank robberies by giving robbers a pile of blank checks and
penalizing banks for having cash on hand.The only proper solution to
illegal immigration is to secure the borders, and prosecute violators of our
current laws. And, to grant states further powers to round up and deport
illegals if the feds will not do it.Robles and the Sutherland folks
are just plain wrong in their approach!
This bill and all like it are in complete violation of the constitutional laws
and rights of citizens of this country. I completely agree.
Illegals have no rights, which Robles is so desperately trying to amend. This is still an insult to our Constitution. There are NO two ways about
it. There is NO way this is going to pass in the UTAH legislature.What part of illegal immigration does "LUZITA" not understand? To
say it is bipartisan is an insult to my intelligence (and everyone else). You
do not have the numbers to carry it anyway.Let's make it a voted
issue and see how far it doesn't go. And how do you expect Ms.
Robles, to get the illegals to register? That will never happen. They would
be/are perfectly happy to stay anonymous. You have got to be
kidding yourself and be blindfolded to the truth. To many holes in
this proposal to carry a bucket of water. It is a NO GO.
I think Robles' bill is encouraging. An if it steps on federal toes -- a fed
that is unable to act towards reform itself -- it is in good company with
federal laws that needed changing. Sometimes a state has to show the feds how to
do things. The US Constitution has proven flexibility in the past when human
rights were at issue. It can do it again.
Have anyone read this bill? I just read it and to say that it could become a
national model is hard to believe. Illegals want to remain anonymous so they
will not get caught by ICE and sent back home to their country of origin. In the
last section of the bill it states very clearly that Utah would share the permit
holder database with the Feds. Am I missing something here? Let me
see if I get this straight. If I'm an illegal and I want to remain here, why
would I apply for a work permit so that I could have my name put in a
"illegal worker" (for all intents and purposes) database.
Additionally, business who want to apply to become a "permit holder"
employer is voluntary. As far as I can tell, who in their right mind
would sign up for this. Not the illegals I've run across.
yarrlydarb...read the bill...it won't work!Immunity isn't provided
and this bill gives ICE a reason to round up all of the illegals and send them
home. Actually, maybe Robles is on to something. This could save ICE
a lot of money.
The bill doesn't have a chance. With no mandatory law enforcement included, it
falls way short. Moreover, to say the bill has bipartisan support is simply
wrong - over 60 percent of Utahns support enforcement and Sandstrom's bill even
though media are not stating this in their one-sided stories. Even the
leadership of Hispanic Republican Assembly believes Robles' bill is short on
substance and long on ineffective bureaucracy.
WE do not need guest workers, or illegals, or amnesty. Her bill will never make
it in utah or anywhere else.
So the same people who scream, "States can't mess in an area reserved for
the federal government," when a State attempts to help enforce existing
federal law, then turn around and support a bill that flat out undermines
federal law!?!?!!!??The hypocrisy of the pro-illegal-alien crowd is
beyond the pale.To big business looking for cheap labor to be used
and abused, to liberal elites and race baiters looking to undermine our culture
while perpetuating a permanent underclass and criminal class I say the same
thing:The grassroots has had a gut full. Republicans, democrats,
and independents alike are sick of this. Read the comments here, or on the SL
Tribune. The regular folks, the voters, agree on immigration as we do nothing
else.With rare exception, among the regular voters, hardcore
conservatives, pinko commie liberal, and everyone in between is sick and tired
of open borders.Cannon and Bennett have been retired at least partly
over this issue.Let's see how many State legislators want to lose
This bill is a disaster. Supporters of this bill who hate the AZ law because it
"violates federalism" have shown their hand. They do not care about
protecting federal power.
What a joke! There is only one answer: deport the illegals and jail the
companies who employed them! That's the only answer..
"This bill just brings those people to the surface and lets us know who
they are and where they live."So if we can know where illegal
aliens live and who they are, we can certainly send them back to their home
I am not in favor of amnesty, etc. I am in favor of getting to solutions that
don't dehumanize illegal immigrants from ANYWHERE (illegals are not all
brown).How odd that all of you fighting for state's rights can't
even allow a discussion of Robles' ideas. Perhaps start with a good idea, and
make it better.One good idea...admit what you really are.Make up your minds, hypocrites!
Let US All be nice here.I see a lot of negative attitude towards recognizing that we are ALL God's children.We should respect other's
situations and Not Judge just because of which side of a "man
made"border their mother was on when she gave birth.Respect is the Word: Red and Yellow, Black and Brown and White, They Are All
Precious in His Sight!!Thanks to Luz Robles for coming up with some
New Ideas!! Hopefully some of them will Help in thisproblem. Empathy is a Gift!!
Just yesterday, I was listening to a talk program while driving in Colorado and
the hosts were discussing illegal immigration with Congressman Jared Polis. He
mentioned that Utah was a State known for being welcoming to illegal aliens.
At some point it would be nice if Utah would get its act together
and actually pass something that cracks down on illegals instead of creating a
magnet for them. I'm pretty confident that this attempt at state-based amnesty
will not get very far in the GOP dominated legislature.
Passing the responsibility to verify legality from the illegal immigrant to his
employer is nonsense. At the very least, the illegal immigrant would still be
guilty of being an accessory to an illegal act, just like the driver of the
get-away car is as guilty as the bank-robber for whom he 'works'.Validating their 'status' and allowing them to 'work' legally just because
they're already here would be the same as paying a bank-robber to empty the
garbage on his way out of the bank, because 'he was already there'.Don't reward corruption.Don't reward anything illegal.Require that those who are doing anything that is illegal be subject to the
full extent of the law. Ignorance of the speed limit is not a valid defense in
traffic court, neither is ignorance of our immigration laws a valid defense.
Make EVERY person who is here illegally leave the country before being to
re-enter.Just because politicians are willing to look the other way
in exchange for votes does not magically make illegal entry into this country
Would it make a difference if these "illegals" were beautiful,blond
haired,blue eyed danes,from lets say Denmark or Norway? I`m sure it would.You`re
showing your true colors again utah
And if you're going to treat "illegals" as illegals, what about white
collar and politicians who do illegal things? How many are in luxury
"jails", or not in jail at all?Consistency, my friends."I smell mendacity"
Elliot, the Sutherland Institute has an extremly liberal view of illegal
immigration. Also, Deseret News, call it illegal immigration,
not"undocumented worker" Have you noticed supporters of amnesty call
I think this is a great idea but it should be ammended to state Illegals can
work but they will be taxed at 50%. This way they can either pay to live here
since they are illegal or they can go home.
Why do liberals like "Clueless" think that if Utah wants to enforce
laws because people are breaking the law in front of our face. Only liberals can
get angry at the law because they will get more votes if they grant amnesty.
Making E-Verify mandatory - YES!Issuing state work permits - NO!
With real unemployment at 17%, do we really need to let 12 to 25 million
additional foreign nationals compete with Americans for work??? Who is Senator
Rubles representing??? Certainly not American citizens.
Great Insight Re: Considering in Stockton, UT!!! Well said. Sounds
like someone wants us to believe their bill will pass like the Emperor's new
clothes s scenario. "The hypocrisy of the pro-illegal-alien
crowd is beyond the pale."
This bill is taking Utah and the rest of the country in the complete WRONG
direction. This is sort of a "throw up your hands" bill instead of a
law enforcement bill. Just throw up your hands and admit we can't control
illegal workers so let's just allow them all in and then "try" to keep
track of them. So just open the flood gates and bring in all of these non-tax
paying illegals which will bring the public school system to its knees (actually
it is already there) and not to say what this will do for the health care system
as well as the local county jails. This is INSANE and I hope the Utah
legislature gives a quick thumbs down for this thing. This is EXACTLY the sort
of thinking that has brought California to bankruptsy.
Brother Paul:Come on. Read Robles' body language in the photo
provided. She has a forlorn look that she is not fully convinced this bill will
ever fly. Whoa is she. She must have a conflict of interest
somewhere. All of God's children should also keep and obey His commandments
too. Do they? Laws are laws and are not to be broken or challenged when they
are supporting illegal activity. A no brainer.
E-verify is the answer and it must be made MANDITORY. Take a look at California
right now if you want to see the eventual outcome of promoting and accomidating
illegal immigration over the long term. The state is bankrupt. Bankruptsy serves
no one - including the lower income citizens - and Ms Robles is more concerned
with amnesty for Hispanics than the economic viability of the state.
Good for Miss Robles Encourgment Helps to others..Not everyone
is born Illegal not everyone is a Criminal!
Re: ConsideringI noticed you pointed out the hypocrisy of those who
deny AZ's law on basis of Federal law and support this, but conveniently ignore
all those that bash this proposal on the basis of federal law (see: first
comment), but still support the AZ law. There are clearly two sides to that
I find the instant antagonism witnessed here against the many advantages of the
Robles bill disheartening. I would think that with the recent attention on the
harmful consequences of bullying we would be more cautious of those in our
society and our state legislature who misconstrue and manipulate the law to
rationalize vindictive agendas needlessly harmful to others.
Illegal aliens, undocumented immigrants, whatever you want to call them are not
going to leave this country because of tougher laws. Senator Robles idea is
different and innovative. Perhaps, her idea will not get very far. But, it is
interesting to see a State Senator proposing a law that may actually bring
individuals out of the shadows. Some of the complaints against undocumented
immigrants is that they don't pay taxes, that they are not accountable to the
system, etc. It seems that senator Robles is attempting to confront a problem
proposing a legal solution. Vinegar is not working, perhaps is time to start
using honey. Amnesty is not a dirty word, actually is a beautiful word that
civilized and enlighten people created to prevent further deterioration in a bad
situation and give hope a second chance.I for one am glad that regardless
the result of this proposal, hopefully, a smart and humane dialogue will start.
Even the vociferous and angry voice of the "righteous" is being
expressed through these coments, it's a beautiful thing :)
"Robles' bill creates a system that would give illegal immigrants already
living in the state a legal avenue to work."What's next? Giving
murderers a legal avenue to murder? Car-jackers a legal avenue to car-jack?
Robbers a legal avenue to rob?Some innovative thinking is necessary
to deal with illegal immigration but this is not it.
What I find interesting about this is that when it comes to following imigration
laws that have been on the books for years people in this state cry "It's
the law, so you shouldn't violate it." Yet when it comes to laws on federal
lands the cry is "Tyrany!!!"
I`m sure it`s all good when these folks are roofin your house or tending to your
chores.But the thought of them learning English and becoming citizens? does
racist ring a bell hot rod?
"Would it make a difference if these 'illegals' were beautiful,blond
haired,blue eyed danes,from lets say Denmark or Norway? I`m sure it would.You`re
showing your true colors again utah."And in making that
statement you show your own bigotry towards an entire state and it's people.
The answer to your question about the race of an illegal is a
resounding no. It would make no difference to me. This issue, for
the majority of us is not about race, even though some in the pro-illegal crowd
continue to try to make it so.I've stated this before and I'll state
it again and again, shame tactics will not work. We Utahns are way beyond being
ashamed of wanting our laws enforced and fairness re-established.
I find the virulent rejection expressed by many of the fair and balanced Robles
bill astonishing. Recently I have observed that whenever immigration matters
are discussed there is an immediate onslaught of tired comments clamoring
beyond reason for the prompt and unconditional punishment of all
"illegals". Only later are these curious attacks tempered by a
diversity of more responsible opinions. Likely what we are witnessing is an
organized response by a relatively small group of shills of the radical,
supremacist-tinged right attempting to spin their message as the majority view.
In an effort to by openminded about this issue...this is what confuses me.Say an illegal alien registers to have a work permit, giving them a
legal right to live in Utah. What would happen to this person if the Federal
government decided to do their job and enforce Federal laws?Obviously, this law goes against Federal law as much, if not more, than
Sandstrom's bill (or AZ's law). Where is the outcry that immigration is a
In principal I like Senator Robles bill. In reality I find it hard to believe
it could be in anyway constitutional. Congress has the right to
control immigration. It is congressionally approved immigrantion laws that
allow people to work in the United States. Thus it would be
over-stepping its legitimate role for a state to grant working rights to people.
In fact, due to the wording of the constitution since 1808 the Federal
Government has had the uncontested right to determine who can and who can not
enter the United States and under what rules such can be done.Senator Robles' bill is a good idea, but it has to be done by the Federal
I would have to say that the claim that people who oppose undocumented
immigration do not do so because of hate of Mexicans is undermined by the words
of some commentors here. Still, Senator Robles' proposed law
represents much greater conflict with federal power than Arizona's law ever did.
In Arizona they just said they would aid the federal government in identifying
and detaining people who were not legally here, based on federally formulated
rules. Senator Robles is trying to have the state of Utah say "we know you
are here in violation of US law, but we will proactivly grant you a right to
work, the central issue in federal laws". What next, will
Robles propse the "international students funding freedom act" which
would change the rules for international students working in Utah?
Congress has the power to determine who has the legal right to work in the
United States. Senator Robles bill might be a good solution if it was enacted
by the federal government, but it does not work on the state level.
I cannot believe the hardheartedness of most of these comments. The
world is made up of two types of people: scarcity-minded and
abundance-minded.The scarcity-minded are always afraid that there
exists too little in the world for most persons to survive.The
abundance-minded know that there is more than enough for everyone.Scarcity-minded people are afraid that they will end up having less than they
want, so they hoard and hold on to what they think is theirs, never seeming to
realize that ALL that they possess is a gift from someone who is all benevolent
and loving. Nothing scarcity-minded people "have" truly belongs to
them.Abundance-minded people know that they will personally possess
all that they need, IF they are mindful of the needs of their fellow man.Scarcity-minded persons are the most selfish people alive.Abundance-minded people are more interested in the welfare of EVERYONE than in
themselves alone.Scarcity-minded people are pessimists.Abundance-minded people are optimists.Scarcity-minded people call
themselves conservatives.Abundance-minded people couldn't care less
what others label them. They know we are all children of the same Creator.
While Federal Amnesty of undocumented immigrants is clearly constitutional,
state amnesty would seem to be the state taking a federal role. The
debates about federal "amnesty" and related bills center around what
should be done, and what the government is capable of doing, and how much of a
police state we want. In the state context there is another
issue. Does the state have the right to set up an alternative policy? The
answer is no. The state can not pass laws that would make it so Jose Contraras
and his family can stay here if the Federal Government is determined to deport
them. Federal LAw trumps state law, so Utah can not start issuing purple cards
as alternative forms of working right to the federal green cards.
How sad it is that some people are so presumptuous and closed-minded as to
suggest that only people who agree with their preferred policy can be considered
responsible. Disagreeing with your opinion does not, of itself, make another
person irresponsible.The easiest way to spot someone who is
politicking is to find someone who claims that they have cornered the market of
responsibility, integrity, or any other virtue.
I am kind of wondering what element of the illegal issue will actually be
resolved through this kooky bill.Near as I can tell, all the
elements of illegals will continue.The magnet of legitimizing some
illegals will certainly draw many many more to Utah.The Sutherland
Institute has sold us out for their cheap labor sponsors.
I will have to second the contention that this bill is not bi-partisan. The
Dream Act was, at least in its early days, much more bi-partisan, and that died
because not enough Democrats would support it. The Dream Act also
died because the concerns expressed by Senator Coryn were never addressed. At
least if he speaks the truth than Senator Coryn would have supported the Dream
Act if it allowed for zero arrests of the beneficiaries. Persoanlly
I think the Dream Act might have passed if they had lowered the minimum age at
entry to 14 or 13, 15 is high to be claiming these are children with no choice
in the matter. This bill would be in general a fairly good one on
the federal level. However as a state bill it does not work.Lastly
I have to say that the statement about partisan politics killing federal
immigration reform needs a lot of balance. During the 109th congress the senate
had a bi-partisan group moving forward immigration reform, but it was killed as
much due to democrats like Stabenow of Michigan voting against it as by
Republicans opposing it.
This bill still rewards previous illegal activity.
I hope everyone contacts their Legislator and encourages Him/Her to support Rep.
Sandstrom's bill. We must make E-verify mandatory state wide. Dry up the Jobs
Illegals hold. Stop ALL the State freebies Illegals receive. Pass laws that will
cause these people to self deport!
I think that Senator Robles ideas are worthy of discussion. The only way we will
ever solve illegal immigration is through allowing enough legal immigration to
meet economic realities. In the early 1960 50% of American citizens did not
graduate from high school and may have been willing to do some of the jobs these
individuals are doing. Presently 10% of American citizens do not graduate from
high school. There are not enough high school kids in this country to pick all
the fruit and shear all the sheep and do all the landscaping and cleaning in
hospitals and hotels and many other areas. We need to realize that these
individuals are and can have a greater potential to be an asset to our country.
I see many positive comments posted here among those who can not see the
workableness of the punishing only solution. If you believe these people are
real human beings then it is time to come out of the shadows and sign the Utah
I have some rhetorical questions to ask... 1.) What if the illegals
don't follow the rules of this law? Will there be consequences then? 2.) At what point should the consequences of breaking the law, be harsh enough
to deter the crime itself? Is a free ride back to Mexico really a punishment?How about if we fly the illegals to Antarctica and let them begin their
return journey from there?
When you invite someone to sit down and eat at your table it is called chairty.
When it is forced upon you it is called a tax or slavery.
If we ever want to get a handle on immigration this bill offers something that
is reasonable almost. My concern stems from the fact all immigrants would have
to carry papers. Does this mean hispanics who are citizens will have to start
proving to police they are here legally? If so this bill is unacceptable. Just
like the Arizona law.No laws should be allowed which place more of a
burden on minorities than the population in general.
I really don't see most illegals who are either working for cash only or stolen
social security numbers to be running to stand in line for this voluntary work
permit thingy.But offerring any kind of permit to those who have
committed misdemeanors and felonies (with stolen ID) is nothing short of martial
Let's be clear: we are ALL children of God.That includes the roughly
1 BILLION people world wide who would like to come here if they could.It includes any number of persons worldwide who would love to kill every US
Citizen and level every US city. It includes my own children and parents.
Simply put, "children of God" is a meaningless platitude as it is now
being tossed around. It is also an overtly religious belief that is not shared
by everyone and so maybe its application to public policy and law should be
every bit as limited as say religious beliefs about sexual morality, alcohol, or
Sabbath observance.We ALL believe in humane treatment of our fellow
men. Let's just not be too selective in only worrying about a few illegal
aliens among us. How do we show love and compassion toward the millions of LAW
ABIDING persons who want to immigrate but can't just illegally walk across our
borders? What about showing love to our own citizens who need work, or own
children who need a quality education? What about those victimized by ID theft
of other crimes common among illegal aliens?
Doesn't really matter anyway because this bill has ZERO chance of passing in
Utah. I think the national media picked up on it to try and put pressure on the
Utah legislature but this thing is headed for the dumpster. Every attempt at
amnesty for illegals - whether an out right amnesty bill such as Harry Reids
dream act or a smaller step such as Ms Robles bill - will fail espeically with
the results of the Nov 2 elections nation wide. Many governors and state
legislatures turned GOP so on Nov 2 so all these back door amnesty tricks are
toast. Sorry libs.
Robles' bill simply means amnesty. We don't want amnesty. We can't afford
amnesty. Amnesty of any kind, including what Robles is proposing. We have 15
million unemployed Americans who are sucking up billions in unemployment
benefits. Illegals are taking these jobs. They need to go home. We don't need
them and can't afford them. And we can't afford the millions of illegals who
will follow should they see that their illegal brothers and sisters can remain
in this country.What we need is enforcement of immigration hiring.
E-Verify, they call it. Americans need to get back in control of our country.
We are not a country if we continue to be overrun with immigrants, illegal and
otherwise.We need Sandstrom's bill. We don't need Robles' bill.
I think my white ancestors didn't file the proper paperwork when they emigrated
in the 1700s. I'll have to check with the Native Americans and see if they have
@skiutah:"As far as I can tell, who in their right mind would
sign up for this."We need a bill that will require illegals to
come forth and identify themselves... so we can have them arrested and
deported."Not the illegals I've run across."If
you know of illegals you need to report them. Failure to do so is in violation
of a federal Harboring of Illegals law.
@wear2manyhatz"I am not in favor of amnesty, etc. I am in favor
of getting to solutions that don't dehumanize illegal immigrants from ANYWHERE
(illegals are not all brown)."Anything that allows illegals to
stay in this country, for whatever reason, is AMNESTY. We don't want amnesty.
Too many people are doing things right to come to this country for us to even
consider allowing illegals to stay. It's an insult to those who are trying to
do the right thing.-----@Brother Paul:"Respect is the Word: Red and Yellow, Black and Brown and White, They Are
All Precious in His Sight!!"No, no. Respect for the laws of
Can we get a govt airline that will run back and forth across the globe and
usher in Illegals from all parts of the world who want to live here? Why are we only opening our border to just Mexicans/Central/South Americans,
Clueless:"Would it make a difference if these 'illegals' were
beautiful,blond haired,blue eyed danes,from lets say Denmark or Norway?"It would be nice to get someone other than Hispanics. They have a
wonderful country with lots of resources including an abundance of the precious
commodity, oil. If Danes, Norwegians, etc., had that kind of resource they
would see no need to immigrate here. And if they did, they would likely do it
the legal and proper way.
Take a look at the postings here today and the support it is gaining AGAINST
this ridiculous idea by a large margin. This couldn't pass in a million years
and if it did it would be shot down instantly by a court. How can you set up a
pass to break the law for one group of people? A group of people who already
have no right to be here no less and who have already broken the law. This thing
is a monument to stupidity. Ask millions of unemployed workers who
actually have a right to be here if they think these job stealing criminal out
to given a free pass. This is nothing short of completely outrageous. No one
with any brains is going to get behind this, and any politician in Utah who
supports it is done in the next election.
I hope the republicans will support this bill. Everytime a republican takes a
real hard line stand on immigration he/she go's bye bye. Tom Tancrado, J.D
Hayworth ect. Sen. Robles. Talked with you on the phone. Im a
republican, and many other republicans I know supports your bill. You are
becoming very popular across the country. Your bill is full of common sense.I hope this bill will pass. It will show a great example to the country
that Utahns are practical, non extremists, and has commpassion for their fellow
man.Utah can look like a hero and a leader, or an Arizona that is
causing nothing but hate, discrimination and divide.
The greatest tragedy of this bill would be seen abroad. Conditions abroad will
not improve as long as those who want something better are encouraged/empowered
to leave their countrymen to their fate instead of working to improve
circumstances, reduce poverty, etc.If the focus is to help people
improve their living conditions, I think a government-sanctioned brain-drain
from foreign countries drastically misses the mark.
In 1856 when my great great grandfather and his family came to the US and Utah,
they showed up at US immigration in New York. Their names were taken down and
they were sent on their way.They then walked into Utah with the
Martin Handcart Company and were welcomed with open arms.Then there
was my grandmother, who was born in Utah, moved to Canada in her early 20's.
After about 70 years in Canada she was still an American Citizen and a
registered Republican. Nobody gave her a bad time.We LDS of all
people should be more than a little understanding of immigration.
How can we not have the money for local enforcement for local immigration
enforcement, but we do have enough to start an entirely new department and
enforcement agency. Every child born here to the guest workers would
be a birth right citizen, and further complicate the situation.
How I wish the Deseret News would stop propagandizing for illegal aliens. One
front page story after another. This bill is ridiculous. And Paul Mero, I love
ya. But you're up in the night on this one.
What nonsense. Sandstrom's proposal has a much greater chance of becoming a
national model because the majority of Americans want the rule of law upheld and
for illegals to be held accountable. Only a minority want illegals rewarded, as
they would be with Robles' bill.Deseret Media, you're not winning
the debate on this issue. Your behavior as self-appointed chief propogandist for
the state only makes me want you to fail, along with all businesses that
actively employ illegals. Breaking the law is wrong.And by the way,
everyone should be cautious of anyone who claims they've cornered the market on
@Erika - Salem, UT; you say, "I think Robles' bill is encouraging...
sometimes a state has to show the feds how to do things." I agree with you
100%, however, not in regards to Senator Robles' bill, but to Arizona's 1070 and
our own coming Utah/Sandstrom bill. Let the State and Local law enforcement help
ICE enforce federal immigration law that has been virtually and literally
ignored by the 'feds' for twenty-four years.
@Erika Salem, UT; you say, I think Robles bill is encouraging sometimes a state
has to show the feds how to do things. I agree with you 100%, however, not in
regards to Senator Robles bill, but to Arizonas 1070 and our own coming
Utah/Sandstrom bill. Let the States help ICE enforce federal immigration law
that has been virtually and literally ignored by the feds for twenty-four years.
When is the liberal media machine going to finally get it, that the people just
aren't buying this propaganda anymore? The overwhelming majority of
us will never be convinced that amnesty is a "model" for America, and
no matter how many times they try to push it through, we will never allow our
lawmakers to give amnesty to these illegal border jumpers.
The truth is in the debate over a Robles bill vs. a Sandstrom bill that the
simple-minded jingoism of the Sandstrom group about "the law" is
clearly less a legitimate concern than a symptom of a deeper angst stemming in
part from a mindset of scarcity, typical of more closed and conservative
societies. Lacking documentation in and of itself hardly qualifies as
reasonable justification for the harsh, vindictive treatment of
"illegals" advocated by those who in their fervor mistake the law for
Ajax,So the truth (according to you), is that obeying the law is a
symptom of a simple minded crowd of conservatives who from a closed society.
Typical liberal response...if you can't win the argument, vilify your
opponent. From where I sit, the truth is that there is a scarcity of jobs
all over America and I want to see the law enforced so that American citizen's
don't lose their houses, due to an influx of illegal aliens who drive down wages
and take jobs. I wonder which one of our "truths" is a reality
for Americans?Oh, and by the way, no one is advocating harsh or vindictive
treatment of illegals. Sending them back to their homelands is simply undoing a
wrong that the illegals themselves perpetrated.
All the self righteous people here should concentrate on something more
important. The Department of State is gonna make "gender neutral"
passports removing father and mother from the application and instead put Parent
1 and Parent 2 to be sensitive to the feelings of "other kinds of
families"...yeah right,,Look into things like this that really damage your
country...immigrants do not
The only thing more ridiculous than Robles bill is the kid glove treatment and
acceptance news sources such as the Deseret News are giving it. Why isnt it
called a controversial immigration bill. It surely is just as controversial as
the Sandstrom bill. It just happens to be controversial to a different set of
people.How tone deaf can you be to the will of the citizens of this
country and state? The United States Congress attempted to pass an amnesty bill,
using the code word comprehensive back when Bush was president. It didnt work
then and it wont work now. You should find a new code name we all know what
comprehensive means to you.You want a comprehensive bill try this:Secure the boarderMake it a felony to hire an illegalCorrectly
interpret the 14th amendmentDone
Pro illegal alien politicians and the criminals themselves are all using the
constitution like a piñata. Smashing it to bits while hoping for some
free goodies to fall out. Stop this madness and enforce the laws.
To undertake legislation affecting thousands of families in the facile and
cavalier fashion of the Sandstrom crowd would be a huge mistake, costly in the
extreme and leading to a level of human abuse to our lasting discredit.
Clueless: Perhaps you are unaware that in Denmark today every attempt is being
made to restrict immigration into that country. An enormous number of Muslims
are attempting to move there and the Danes are attempting to limit them, most
recently by passing a law raising their legal marriage age to 25 (Culturally,
today, Danes dont marry at all or marry late, while culturally Muslims marry as
young as teenagers). Making the laws of their nation undesirable to Muslims is
a rather ingenious way to stop the onslaught, wouldnt you agree?Just
a heads up for you, Clueless, that ALL groups seek to maintain their culture and
their ways for the benefit of their future young, and rightly so; even the
extremely liberal Danes who generally love and have welcomed all. When too much
becomes too much, the welcome mat SHOULD be removed.
Ajax, To continue things as they are (allowing illegals to continue
to come here, use our resources, take our jobs, etc...) is also costly in the
extreme and leading to the detriment of the U.S. citizens that our politicians
are supposed to protect. Tell me Ajax, who stands up for OUR citizens?
wow. all you conservatives ranting about "illegal is illegal" and the
constitution, etc is just mindboggling.this lady's idea is actually
a pretty good one. it's not like the undocumented workers aren't already here.
might as well integrate them into society.and to all you naysayers -
I say walk a mile in an undocumented worker's shoes. you are simply lucky.
that's all. simple luck to have been born here instead of somewhere else.i see your attitude as the same as winning the lottery and keeping it
all to yourself instead of helping others. it's the exact same thing.i feel bad for you. especially if you call yourselves christians. I'm not
even religious but even I know that what you are saying is wrong...
At least someone is thinking of solutions and thinking out of the box, it is a
start, thank-you Sen. Robles.
This is a step in the right direction.
Consider the empty rhetoric that could be avoided in recognizing what we all
should know by now, namely that 1) being in our country without documentation is
not necessarily a felony, 2) undocumented Hispanic immigrants are not the
cause of the downturn in our economy, nor of people losing their homes, nor of
high unemployment 3) undocumented Hispanic immigrants pay taxes, and 4)
undocumented Hispanic immigrants receive decidedly less rather than more of the
benefits and advantages available to the rest of us.Yes,
undocumented Hispanic immigrants make a convenient scapegoat for your problems
and mine. But they are in all too many ways unjustly accused. Let's act
responsibly in understanding that the real solution to our problems lies with us
and not with them.
We know it's illegal, and therefore a crime. We know that the Federal government
is not doing it's job, costing local and state governments billions of dollars
each year. We know something has to be done. We need self
deportation laws that make it difficult for people to live here illegally, and
for states to put the responsibility back on the Federal government by flooding
the system with local arrests country wide. Guest worker programs
are dependent on proving that citizens will not work the jobs available. Federal
law states there has to be a need. Robles bill ignores this fact, and that is an
insult to the 100,000 Utahns out of work.
Call it as it is: a minority politician representing an illegal minority group's
interests angainst the will of the American people.