'Sharron Angle not likely to flee politics' - Title Perhaps
not politics, but she flee's reporters just fine. 'Sharron
Angle Runs From Reporters At Her Own Press Conference' - The Huffington Post -
Elyse Siegel - 07/22/10 Line: 'Nevada Senate candidate
Sharron Angle proved to be camera shy once again when she declined to take
questions from reporters at a media-friendly event organized by her campaign on
Wednesday.' I wonder if that was done on purpose? Regardless, I shocked when she claimed incest victims should have the
baby. 'In a radio interview Angle did in late June, the
Tea Party favorite re-affirmed her pro-life sensibilities (rigid, as they are,
even within Republican circles), when she insisted that a young girl raped by
her father should know that "two wrongs don't make a right." - 'Sharron
Angle's Advice For Rape Victims Considering Abortion...' - By Sam Stein -
Huffington Post - 07/08/10 As I have mentioned before, I
have many issues with the LDS church... I still would have voted for
Reid instead of Sharon Angle.
My money says there was voter fraud in her loss to Reid.Why do I say
that?She cleaned his clock in the Angle/Reid televised debade and
then, after that, for almost a week before the election Angle had about a 4
point lead in virtually every poll and then she loses to Reid by about 5
points.That's a 9 point swing in a week.How often does
that happen?Makes me think that the "voting irregularities" the GOP
complained about immediately after the NV voting stations opened for early
voting were legitimate.
There wasn't any fraud necessary. When a candidate runs from
reporters and tells them she won't talk until after the election, she shows
cowardice. All Reid had to do is point this out along with all her other
statements and it was over.A competent republican politician would
have beaten Reid. Thanks to the teabags the republicans lost a senate seat.Good news.
If Angle felt she was cheated, why not say so as loudly and often as possible?
Any accusation GWB has to make shouldn't be just from his brain. I didn't see
the debate he referred to, but Angle certainly wouldn't be the first debate
"winner" to lose the election. And any false margin of more than 5% has got to
involve thousands of individual acts of fraud. Can that happen with complete
secrecy? That's a serious enough accusation that GWB better back it with
something more than a hunch.