Please don't have an ideological dog fight with the development of thousands of
Utah's children. The investment in them now will make a lifelong difference.
I see a problem with the comment in the paper that said they'll probably follow
normal distribution of money. That mean's administrators (we can do without
more), custodians etc. If we take the money put it all on hiring teachers and
reduce class size. This will help students the most.
I think its good to look at what strings the Feds are attaching first. Then make
the choice being informed.
@pharmacist you are right about the strings as the bill requires a commitment of
those that accept the money not to decrease funding to schools next year. The
slow recovery is projected now, even by the Fed. Removing the option for cuts in
education, the largest portion of the States budget, is like the Federal
Government saying how states must budge their money. Add, in the increases in
Medicaid inheriant in the Health Care Reform Act and you are painting the States
that accept this money into a fiscal straight jacket next year. Thanks, but no
I can't believe legislators are even having this conversation. We're not
satisfied with being the worst state for education funding in the country? We're
now trying to compete with 3rd-world countries for the title?The
national debt is definitely a problem (always was, even back when Reagan, Bush,
and Bush II each took their turn doubling it), but underfunding education is an
idiotic approach to addressing it. Education is the thing that fuels the economy
in the long term. If we don't have an educated workforce, companies don't want
to set up shop here. Utah's academic performance is already in decline (even
though the low number of minorities in our state tweaks the statistics, both our
white students and our minority students underperform on average).Firing teachers won't help reduce the deficit; it will just make us
ill-prepared to contribute to an economic recovery.
So the bill requires utah to not cut funding for education that's the catch?
The bill will give utah schools 101 million. Teachers will keep
their jobs.Class sizes will be smaller. Kids will get a better
education.Some in the Legislature are not sure they want the above things
for Utah's Children. But they, "will hold their heads high knowing they did not
contribute to the bankruptcy of America." The money will be spent, but the tax
payers of Utah will not get a share of their own tax dollars, thanks to the high
heads in the Legislature...UNBELIEVABLE.
I say we always do the opposite of what the Sutherland Institute says which is
the same group that thinks we should be more compassionate to the illegal
immigrants (i.e. cheap labor for business).
Worried about what strings are attached?????Hopefully the children
this money educates will be smarter than paranoid politicians now in office.Utah already is in the position of taking more money than they pay in
taxes. Why take the high road or the political stand on the backs of the
poorest paid teachers in the country or on the backs of children. What lesson
should they learn?
The whole so called "stimulus package was a lie and a farce, we know now that a
large portion of the taxpayers money is being held back in a slush fund until
the elections in November, as for the first so called emergency world financial
meltdown bailout, again we now know after the fact a large potion went to global
interests not American interests, and when the secretary of the fed was asked
where the money went she couldn't give anyone and answer,do you think something
smells here? And now the stimulus money (second bailout) is spent on keeping the
bloated inefficient government school system functioning with it's non
competitive tenured for life teachers in place while the rest of us in the
public sector have to work for a living? and that's if we can find work, now you
know why the people kicked Bailout Bob out the door, politicians be warned, the
sheep are tired of being sheared.
Dangling the carrot of greed that will serve no purpose in helping education.
Waddups has sold his soul to greed and has his head on backwards and where the
sun don't shine.At least Herbert is using some rationale and sanity
in being cautious. These funds help save teachers jobs? Not likely. Jobs are
permanent, this money is one time bribery and a lottery. Kennedy had it right,
"what can you do for your country"?Enforcing immigration and labor
laws will decrease the class size and the pressure on teachers. Enforcing
immigration laws would mean we can cut funds to the DWS, Welfare, Chip, Food
stamps, and day care services that education supplies. We already have enough
education money, it's just being diverted and used for the wrong reasons.All Americans, including education, have a duty to think of America and
our excessive debts. Its about sacrifice, even if it means cuts to education and
welfare and UDOT. We didn't become america because government fed us, we become
americans because we can survive without government handouts (Socialism). We put
our country ahead of ourselves is what made america.
Utah Familys are 100 years behind the times, The Children are to busy playing
Ball Games and not Learning about Social Studies.I do not know how Utah'ns
can work in Aero Space with their Educations.Just try Mowing a Yard or
Here we go again with an idiotic debate where ideology trumps practicality. The
Federal Government has its purpose. Who, really, wants to return to
laissez-faire capitalism with no controls of any kind? We do not live in Utopia.
Many suffer from lack of employment. Look to Southern Utah and see! In my own
neighborhood another neighbor is losing a house.Our state
educational system is an abyss. We need qualified teachers, not merely mothers
who might be qualified to home school, but are usually not, and my experience
with these is that socially the children are not always learning how to cope
with people different than they are--a huge mistake in a country like ours. If this governor will not take the stimulus money, I am changing my
affiliation from Republican to Independent. I'm disgusted.
It is quite obvious that Wimmer hates America and wants Utah to be its own
country. What an idiot. This guys needs to be voted out.
The only thing of which we have to be careful is making long-term commitments
based on one-time money. But we have no option but to make those tough decisions
and take the money. Utah, like the rest of the nation, has been hit by the
record breaking recession. You can argue about whether the Feds should have
thrown "stimulus" money at the banks and auto industry, but turning down money
for education would be foolish.
The devil is always in the details.The "no reduction next year"
basically forces $101 million more in Utah tax dollars next year if we take the
bait this year. In a time when we must cut back government spending and
employees at all levels this is pure insanity. Especially when it looks like
the economy is getting much worse, not better.Waddoups needs to
reconsider his gullible "take the free money" position.Wimmer should
be congratulated for seeing that this scheme indeed would force us to
"...participate in the bankrupting of our nation."If we need more
money for schools, that is a local issue, not an excuse for feds to be involved,
and so far, Utah legislators have wisely kept the funding to an appropriate
level, despite the chronic complaints of the teachers unions who will never be
satisfied with how much they get.Reject this "free money!"
First, there is a flood of children leaving the public schools for charter and
private schools; thus, it's a great time to reduce spending for public
education. Second, the lie is always that more money means better
education, that is simply not true. Utah historically has low funding for
schools, but rates among the highest in the quality of that education.Third, most comments here reveal a large naivete regarding our national
economics. The economy is not going to rebound back to what it was, ever.
Inflation (feds just printing money) is going to knock us all in the head in the
coming years. Fourth, socialism, which is exactly what we have, and
Obama and Pelosi and Reid are shoving more and more of it down our throats, is
an economic killer, not to mention it moves huge amounts of power to the federal
government. Sound familiar?Fifth, tyranny is when the government
does what the people do not want. Tyranny is what we live under today. It's time
to say no to tyranny.
""It's always tempting to take money, particularly when you're in a
recession-type environment," Wimmer said. "Some person or some state or some
group has got to stand up and say no.""------------------Actually, the government spending extra money in recessionary times is EXACTLY
the thing we want to have done.In conjunction, we want to pay off
debt during the good times, but unfortunately that never happens.Bottom line though, this is the right thing for Utah's school children, and
consequently for Utah's and the nations future.As for the argument
that this is Socialism, --- So What? ---Public education is it self
socialism to start with. Please people, consider getting your informatioin from
some place other than talk radio, this isn't any kind of a real education.
RE: DumprakeFirst, charter schools are public schools and receive
public dollars. Oh, and public school enrollment is increasing by 2000+ this
year...Second, Utah "rates among the highest in quality of
education?" Are you insane? By what measure? Third, inflation is
not the feds printing money (what does this have to do with anything?), it is
the cost of consumer goods rising, which can be caused by a variety of factors.
Check your own naivete. Fourth, if you think we live under
socialism you really have no idea what that term means or any understanding of
history...Fifth, when you say we live under tyranny you insult
millions who really have. Again, read a history book. You
anti-government zelots would be a lot more convincing if you actually used facts
to support your arguments rather than believing everything you hear...
I teach fifth grade in Highland, Utah. My class size will be 37 students to
start the year. My class sizes have gone up every year that I have taught. This
will be my sixth year of teaching.I have no "anchor babies" in my
classroom. Just students who are there to learn.You don't want to take the
money because you're worried it will turn you into a socialist, fine. What is
your solution. Status quo? Public education needs that money badly. I feel like a few of our representatives would be happy to see public
education done away with. If this happens the gap between the have and the have
nots will continue to grow. If you don't want to raise taxes, and
you really want five kids, what is your solution?
Just say NO to federal welfare payments.
Utah might as well take the money, because the taxpayers are on the hook for it
regardless. In other words, according to the bill, Utah can refuse the money
but it will just go to another state, but the Utah taxpayer will still get to
pay for it. At least by taking the money, it will be spent in the local economy
which can't hurt local businesses. Remember that for every $1 of spent in the
economy, $2 are created. I hate to break it to folks but we are a
consumer- driven economy.
To all teachers, firemen and police officers who will lose their job if this
grant does not take place, remember who put you in the breadline this November.
I imagine this will end up like South Carolina, where the Governor garnered big
headlines by publicly refusing stimulus funding. But in the end, South Carolina
took the money.When Representative Wimmer made his comment about how
the Democrats are using this to try to buy the election, he proved to me that he
cares more about elections than he does about people.
Mr Obamas bill reflects the absolute worst in election year politics. It is an
attempt to buy votes by the White House and should be scorned by anyone who
loves freedom and integrity.While Utah Schools have generally done a
good job managing costs and their budgets, thousands of districts across the
country have raised wages and benefits faster than local economic growth for
decades. Now they are in a situation where taxpayers are unwilling and even
unable to pay more and are looking the Federal Government to bail themselves out
of the problems created by poor fiscal management. In many low cost, Mid-West
towns, teachers are paid 70-90k per year (for a 8.5 month/year job) and given
benefits that are far in excess of local private employer packages. While
private employers have been adjusting to economic realities over the past 10-15
years, the schools have delayed making needed changes and instead have turned
repeatedly to tax hikes.Now that the public is fed up with the
process, these schools are looking for a handout. The White House is all too
happy to bail them out in an election year.
One more point: This funding is a one-time shot in the arm. It may delay the
inevitable, but it will not change the outcome. We should not be bailing out
school districts and creating moral hazard problems down the road.There is room for government intervention to prevent massive depressions, but
it must be done in the right way. Works projects to build dams, infrastruction,
high-speed rail, retrain displaced workers, etc. can make sense if planned in
advance and spending timed appropriately to coincide with economic downturns.
It's not an easy thing to do, but with pre-planning and pre-approval, it can be
done. When combined with reasonable monetary policy, this could give the
economy a shot in the arm when needed without busting the budget or artificially
propping up parts of the market that desparately need recessions to get excesses
back into equalibrium. But any spending in the trough needs to be offset by net
savings during expansions. This is the part that uncle sam has miseably failed
to accomplish over the past 50+ years.
The cost of accepting this money also includes a special session.What the news has failed to report on is how far off this current year's
budget and the final results of last year's budget. The last news I heard was
in April when we were 100m in the hole. I have heard estimates that if trends
continue that the State will be 700m in the hole by the end of the fiscal
year.Of course the state will accept this money because they have
spent money they didn't have and ignored the consequences BECAUSE it is an
election year. If we are indeed looking at several hundred million in the hole,
all government services including education are going to be on the chopping
block. Layoffs are inevitable.
Karl Wimmer has to be one of the stupidest individuals I've ever in my life
known about or heard about...Our kids and grand-kids futures are going to
stifled because an ex badge heavy dope is against taking some of the money paid
by Utahans, back to help KIDS???Get a grip Wimmer.
Wimmer is exactly right that this is election year politics and a blatant
attempt by the White House and the Democrat controlled Congress to buy votes.
It is slimy politics and it will probably work and buy the Dems some Teachers
Union Votes.Having said that, it is tough to turn our share away if
the Dems are going to bribe voters with it. It's a catch-22...
Carman, Republicans do the same with tax cuts. They bribe voters by passing big
tax cuts. The sad thing is they use the same credit card as the Democrats do.
Democrats finance their stimulus spending while Republicans finance stimulus tax
cuts. Both are stimulus and both run up the deficit. We need something new in
Washington because neither party is worth a salt anymore.
"Utah historically has low funding for schools, but rates among the highest in
the quality of that education."Um, this is actually not true--the
Trib did a study on this a year or two ago. Our performance rankings appear
artificially high because we have a very low percentage of minority students.
The sad fact is that minority students in America tend, on average, to perform
lower academically. Since we have fewer minority students, they pull the average
down less. But if you break out the performance averages by race, white kids in
Utah do poorer academically than white kids elsewhere, and so do minority
kids.So far Utah has received $4.5 billion in stimulus money. Fully
1/3 of that came in the form of tax cuts. The rest has gone local contractors to
build roads and bridges, water treatment upgrades, millions in small business
loans to thousands of small business, Pell grants for job re-training, and of
course saving the jobs of teachers, policemen, and firemen. If you don't think
we should have taken the money, explain how we would have survived without it.
To Scambuster: While I agree with the sentiment you express that Dems and
Repubs often play the same slimy game of buying votes from too-easily-bought
voters, I must disagree with you on the point that tax cuts and special interest
spending are equally bad.With a tax cut, both Dems and Repubs at
each income level receive the same benefit. Rich and poor Dems and Repubs get
the same break. With earmarks and special interest funding, politicians in
power funnel money to their power bases in an effort to win loyalty at the
ballot box. This type of behavior is the most egregious in terms of the harm it
does to democracy, freedom and the respect for government. One additional
point: A tax break can reflect a respect by government that ultimately the
resources of this nation below to its citizens, not their government. But a
government that takes from all to funnel to the few (e.g. a special interest
with political power), is a government that is slowly eroding its citizens
freedom to choose.
To scambuster: I ran out of space before saying that I do agree that we need
something new in Washington. Both sides back their appear to beat on the other
only to solidify their own power bases and feed their own self-interests and
To MormonDem: re "If you don't think we should have taken the money, explain
how we would have survived without it"This is precisely the problem
with pork barrel spending. No one feels like they can stand up and say "NO!" to
the money without feeling cheated. So we end up in a spending spiral without
any way to add discipline to the system. If we hadn't made so many poor
personal decisions such as buying too big of homes, too many four-wheelers, too
many boats, too many vacations, too many new clothes, etc., etc., we would be in
a better to position to take the high ground and ask the nation not to mortgage
our and our children's futures for a bit higher standard of living today.
One thing all of you are not aware of is that the bill states that if the
governor does not apply the money will do directly to a state agency to
disburse, not to another state. There is nothing in the bill that
says that the state needs to spend the same amount next year. What is says is
that the state can't reduce this years budget by the amount received, it is a
concept called maintenance of effort. If this was not included many states
would just reduce their budgets by the amount received from the Feds and there
would be no benefit.
To jotab:There is no benefit either way. We are pulling money out
of one pocket and putting into another. We need to stop thinking of Federal
money as "free money". We are simply taking from our children and putting it
into our own pockets. We are stealing from their futures...