MUMBAI, India — President Barack Obama hasn't been able to drive down unemployment in America, so he's coming to India in search of U.S. jobs.

Four days after his party suffered heavy, economy-influenced losses in Congress, the president will arrive today in Mumbai, India's booming financial center, where he will meet with local business leaders and with American executives who have traveled to India in search of billions of dollars in trade deals.

The White House hopes to announce agreements on aircraft and other exports, and generally broadcast that America is open for business with burgeoning India and its 1.2 billion residents.

The administration says that jobs and the U.S. economy are the focus of Obama's 10-day Asia trip, a message aimed at inoculating him against any criticism that he is concentrating on foreign affairs while Americans are suffering with unemployment at 9.6 percent. He left Washington shortly after the government reported the economy added 151,000 jobs in October but still not enough to lower the jobless rate.

The president said the jobs report was encouraging but "not good enough." In a gesture toward Republicans who won control of the House and made strong gains in the Senate in elections Tuesday, Obama said he was open to "any idea, any proposal" to get the economy growing faster. Republicans generally say the answer is more tax cuts and looser government regulations.

On his foreign trip, the longest of his presidency so far, Obama's business-first message is aimed particularly at India, where he is spending three full days. That's the longest amount of time in any one country on a trip that's also taking him to Indonesia, where he lived for four years as a youth, to South Korea for a meeting of the Group of 20 developed and developing nations and then to Japan for an American Pacific Economic Cooperation forum.

Obama's popularity generally has held steady overseas. Nonetheless, he will be meeting with leaders certain to be aware his political strength has weakened at home.

U.S. and Indian officials have stressed the close ties that have developed between the world's two largest democracies over the past decade. It's a relationship both countries hope will expand and improve — partly, in the U.S. view, as a counterbalance to China's growing power.

Obama will be speaking to a gathering of Indian and American chief executives on Today, and he's expected to announce the completion of job-producing commercial deals. The U.S. has been looking for India to finalize purchases of Boeing aircraft and marine engines produced by Caterpillar, among other exports.

Briefing reporters aboard Air Force One, National Security Adviser Tom Donilon said Obama intends the trip to be "a full embrace of India's rise." The White House is going to great lengths to bring attention to the economic potential and shared democratic values that define its relationship with India.

Said Donilon: "There's no more powerful way to do that than a presidential trip."

However, serious disagreements remain, and they appear unlikely to be resolved during Obama's visit.

India has raised concerns about the billions of dollars in military aid the U.S. is funneling to Pakistan, which is India's archrival but a linchpin for Washington and its allies in the war in Afghanistan. Leaders here also are wary of the increasing rhetoric by U.S. politicians against the outsourcing of jobs abroad, including to India.

A recent move by Congress to increase fees on high-tech workers' visas, relied on by some Indians going to work in America, also has rankled here.

In an interview with the Press Trust of India, Obama said, "As president, I have a responsibility to support jobs and opportunity for the American people, and I believe the U.S.-India economic relationship can and should be a 'win-win' relationship for both of our countries."

He was noncommittal when asked about lifting a ban on the export of certain military goods to India and whether the U.S. would support India's bid for a permanent seat on the U.N. Security Council.

Obama was spending more than 15 hours on his plane, interrupted by a refueling stop in Germany, to get to India.

He will spend about a day and a half in Mumbai before heading to New Delhi, the capital, for meetings with government leaders including Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

Obama also is taking time while in India to visit cultural sites, including a museum in a home where Mohandas Gandhi once lived, and to pay respect to the victims of the 2008 terror attacks that left 166 people dead across Mumbai. Obama and his entourage are staying at the Taj Mahal hotel, one of the main targets of the attacks.

Associated Press Writer Ravi Nessman in New Delhi, India and AP White House Correspondent Ben Feller, traveling with Obama, contributed to this story.

White House responds to reports of Obama trip expense

WASHINGTON — The conservative blogosphere and media megaphones are trumpeting "news" that President Barack Obama's trip to India will cost U.S. taxpayers $200 million a day, but there's no basis in fact for the reports, and history suggests that they're false.

First, the source of the report: an unidentified Indian government official. The Press Trust of India, a news agency, reported this week that Obama's three-day trip to India would cost $200 million a day and include 3,000 people.

The report was posted prominently on the conservative website Drudge Report. Conservative commentator Glenn Beck multiplied it for the rest of Obama's four-country trip, saying it will cost taxpayers $2 billion. And on and on.

The Indian news organization also reported that the United States was sending 34 warships to protect Obama. Official response: The White House says it won't reveal the costs of security for a president's trip, which is long-standing policy. But aides said the $200 million figure was greatly exaggerated.

"The numbers reported in this article have no basis in reality," White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said. "Due to security concerns, we are unable to outline details associated with security procedures and costs, but it's safe to say these numbers are wildly inflated."

The Pentagon said the report about warships was absurd.